• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃尔朗根评分算法在主观认知下降和轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病型痴呆进展的诊断和预测中的应用

The Erlangen Score Algorithm in the diagnosis and prediction of the progression from subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer-type dementia.

作者信息

Filipek-Gliszczyńska Anna, Barczak Anna, Budziszewska Magdalena, Mandecka Monika, Gabryelewicz Tomasz, Barcikowska Maria

出版信息

Folia Neuropathol. 2018;56(2):88-96. doi: 10.5114/fn.2018.76612.

DOI:10.5114/fn.2018.76612
PMID:30509028
Abstract

The evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) (β-amyloid, t-tau, p-tau) can be used to estimate the risk of developing dementia in patients at the pre-clinical stages of AD, i.e. subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Erlangen Score Algorithm allows interpretation of CSF biomarker concentrations and is cut-off value independent. The aim of this study was to establish if this algorithm can be applied for routine diagnostic testing in clinical and preclinical subjects and has prognostic value. We analysed 217 patients from the memory clinic with the diagnosis of SCD (n = 31), MCI (n = 104), and AD (n = 82) with clinical follow-up amounting to 14.33 months (SD = 6.82). It was found that the highest Erlangen Score dominated in the AD group and was the rarest in the SCD group. In the group of patients with progression of symptoms during our period of observation, the AD pathology was confirmed in 93.75% of cases. Among the non-progressing subjects (n = 119) the algorithm indicated the risk of developing AD as possible in 40.34% and probable in 15.97% of cases. To conclude, the Erlangen Score Algorithm is a useful tool to determinate the risk of developing AD before the onset of dementia or to confirm the AD diagnosis. It is extremely valuable in preclinical stages of AD for planning purposes and early intervention as well as for future clinical trials.

摘要

评估用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物(β-淀粉样蛋白、总tau蛋白、磷酸化tau蛋白),可用于估计处于AD临床前期阶段的患者,即主观认知下降(SCD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者发生痴呆的风险。埃尔朗根评分算法可解读CSF生物标志物浓度,且与临界值无关。本研究的目的是确定该算法是否可应用于临床和临床前受试者的常规诊断检测,并具有预后价值。我们分析了来自记忆门诊的217例患者,诊断为SCD(n = 31)、MCI(n = 104)和AD(n = 82),临床随访时间为14.33个月(标准差 = 6.82)。结果发现,最高的埃尔朗根评分在AD组中占主导地位,在SCD组中最为罕见。在我们观察期间症状有进展的患者组中,93.75%的病例确诊为AD病理。在无进展的受试者(n = 119)中,该算法表明40.34%的病例有可能发生AD,15.97%的病例很可能发生AD。总之,埃尔朗根评分算法是一种有用的工具,可用于确定痴呆发作前发生AD的风险或确诊AD。它在AD临床前期对于规划目的、早期干预以及未来的临床试验具有极高的价值。

相似文献

1
The Erlangen Score Algorithm in the diagnosis and prediction of the progression from subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer-type dementia.埃尔朗根评分算法在主观认知下降和轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病型痴呆进展的诊断和预测中的应用
Folia Neuropathol. 2018;56(2):88-96. doi: 10.5114/fn.2018.76612.
2
Erlangen Score as a tool to predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in Alzheimer's disease.埃尔朗根评分作为预测阿尔茨海默病轻度认知障碍向痴呆进展的工具。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Jan 5;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0456-x.
3
Combining Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Neuropsychological Assessment: A Simple and Cost-Effective Algorithm to Predict the Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.结合脑脊液生物标志物与神经心理学评估:一种预测从轻度认知障碍进展为阿尔茨海默病痴呆的简单且具成本效益的算法
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1495-1508. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160360.
4
Association between Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease, APOE Genotypes and Auditory Verbal Learning Task in Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病脑脊液生物标志物、APOE基因分型与主观认知下降、轻度认知障碍及阿尔茨海默病患者听觉言语学习任务之间的关联
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 29;54(1):157-68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160176.
5
Erlangen Score Predicts Cognitive and Neuroimaging Progression in Mild Cognitive Impairment Stage of Alzheimer's Disease.埃尔兰根评分预测阿尔茨海默病轻度认知障碍阶段的认知和神经影像学进展。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(2):551-559. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190067.
6
Use of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease Risk in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Decline in Routine Clinical Care in Germany.在德国的常规临床护理中,使用阿尔茨海默病风险的脑脊液生物标志物来评估轻度认知障碍和主观认知下降。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;78(3):1137-1148. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200794.
7
Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Clinical Progression in Patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment.主观认知下降和轻度认知障碍患者的脑脊液生物标志物与临床进展
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):939-950. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161252.
8
Decreasing body mass index is associated with cerebrospinal fluid markers of Alzheimer's pathology in MCI and mild dementia.体重指数降低与 MCI 和轻度痴呆患者的阿尔茨海默病病理的脑脊液标志物有关。
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Dec 15;100:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale variants in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: change over time and the effect of enrichment strategies.轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病中阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知子量表变体:随时间的变化及强化策略的影响
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Feb 12;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0170-5.
10
Cerebrospinal fluid cortisol and clinical disease progression in MCI and dementia of Alzheimer's type.轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者的脑脊液皮质醇与临床疾病进展
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Feb;36(2):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease within a CSF Aß-ratio grey zone.脑脊液Aβ比值处于灰色区域的疑似阿尔茨海默病患者的临床特征
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 Aug 3;5(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00262-8.
2
[Prognostic and diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in neurodegenerative dementia diseases].[脑脊液分析在神经退行性痴呆疾病中的预后和诊断价值]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Dec;93(12):1236-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01339-6. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Biomarker-Based Signature of Alzheimer's Disease in Pre-MCI Individuals.
基于生物标志物的轻度认知障碍前期个体阿尔茨海默病特征
Brain Sci. 2019 Aug 23;9(9):213. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9090213.