Jin Jian, Li Haihang, Chen Zhengli, Sheng Jiajuan, Liu Tong, Ma Bing, Zhu Shihui, Xia Zhaofan
Department of Burn Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Department of Burn Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Burns. 2018 Dec;44(8):1930-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
This study aimed to investigate whether a three-dimensional (3-D) wound scanner could be used to measure the area of scars. Scar models were constructed using flesh-colored, brown-colored (simulating hyperpigmented scars), orange-colored (simulating scars with obvious vascularization), and white-colored (simulating hypopigmented scars) plastic. Each colored plastic was used to construct scar models with regular and irregular base surfaces (four each). Two human models were selected to simulate patients with scars, and the scar models were placed on the right cheek, right lower jaw-neck, right ulnar forearm, anterior tibial region of the right calf, and at the back of these human models for scar area measurement. Two experimenters separately measured the scar area vertically using the profile method, pixel method, and 3-D wound scanner. Each experimenter measured the scar area thrice. Regarding accuracy, we found significant differences between the data and standard value of various measurement methods (P<0.05); however, the ratio of the data and standard value using the 3-D wound scanner was 0.982, which was the closest to 1, and showed the lowest coefficient of variation. Regarding correlation, Spearman's coefficient using the 3-D wound scanner was 0.992, showing the strongest correlation. With respect to inter-experimenter reliability and stability of retesting, each Cronbach's coefficient of the 3-D wound scanner between the two experimenters was >0.90, showing high reliability; thus, fulfilling the requirements for clinical measurement. The 3-D wound scanner took an average time of 38.87±3.45s for measurement, which was significantly shorter compared that for other methods The 3-D wound scanner showed greater accuracy and correlation, and a shorter measurement time, compared with other measurement methods The inter-experimenter reliability and retesting stability of the 3-D wound scanner also fulfilled the requirements for clinical measurement.
本研究旨在调查三维(3-D)伤口扫描仪是否可用于测量瘢痕面积。使用肉色、棕色(模拟色素沉着过度瘢痕)、橙色(模拟有明显血管化的瘢痕)和白色(模拟色素减退瘢痕)塑料构建瘢痕模型。每种颜色的塑料均用于构建具有规则和不规则底面的瘢痕模型(各4个)。选择两名人体模型模拟有瘢痕的患者,并将瘢痕模型放置在这些人体模型的右脸颊、右下颌-颈部、右尺侧前臂、右小腿胫前区域以及背部,以测量瘢痕面积。两名实验者分别使用轮廓法、像素法和3-D伤口扫描仪垂直测量瘢痕面积。每位实验者测量瘢痕面积3次。在准确性方面,我们发现各种测量方法的数据与标准值之间存在显著差异(P<0.05);然而,使用3-D伤口扫描仪的数据与标准值之比为0.982,最接近1,且变异系数最低。在相关性方面,使用3-D伤口扫描仪的Spearman系数为0.992,显示出最强的相关性。在实验者间可靠性和复测稳定性方面,两名实验者之间3-D伤口扫描仪的每个Cronbach系数均>0.90,显示出高可靠性;因此,满足临床测量要求。3-D伤口扫描仪测量平均耗时38.87±3.