Cognitive and Engineering Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Cognitive and Engineering Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
In the near future, more vehicles will have automated functions. The traffic system will be a shared space of automated and manually driven vehicles. In our study we focused on the perspective of vulnerable road users, namely pedestrians, in cooperative situations with automated vehicles. Established communication methods, such as eye-contact between pedestrians and drivers, may no longer work when automated vehicles represent the interaction partner. Therefore, we evaluated several human-machine-interfaces (HMI) in order to implement smooth and comfortable communication. We conducted a two-stage study consisting of an explorative focus group discussion with naïve pedestrians (n = 6), followed by an experimental video simulation study (n = 25) based on the results of the focus group discussion. From the focus group we sought member opinion about various HMI, upon presentation of acoustic and visual communication systems such as projections, displays and LED light strips, in addition to portable communication systems, specifically smart watches. On the basis of the focus group discussion, an evaluation criteria was derived. For the video simulation study, HMI designs were created with variations in position, type and coding of the message, and technology. These were assessed by 25 subjects according to the focus discussion derived evaluation criteria: recognizability, unambiguousness, interaction comfort and intuitive comprehensibility. The results show that direct instructions to cross the street are preferred over status information of the vehicle and that large-scale text-based messages from the vehicle to the pedestrian, deliver better results. Design recommendations for HMIs for communication between automated vehicles are derived, and the extent external HMIs may supplement informal communication strategies such as vehicle movement or braking maneuvers, is discussed.
在不久的将来,将会有更多的车辆具备自动化功能。交通系统将成为自动化和手动驾驶车辆共享的空间。在我们的研究中,我们专注于易受伤害的道路使用者(即行人)在与自动化车辆协作情况下的视角。当自动化车辆成为交互伙伴时,诸如行人和驾驶员之间的眼神交流等既定的通信方法可能不再有效。因此,我们评估了几种人机界面(HMI),以实现顺畅舒适的通信。我们进行了一项两阶段的研究,包括对天真的行人(n=6)进行探索性焦点小组讨论,以及根据焦点小组讨论的结果进行基于实验视频模拟的研究(n=25)。从焦点小组中,我们征求了成员对各种 HMI 的意见,展示了声学和视觉通信系统,如投影、显示器和 LED 灯带,以及便携式通信系统,特别是智能手表。基于焦点小组讨论,得出了评估标准。对于视频模拟研究,根据评估标准,设计了不同位置、类型和编码消息的 HMI,以及不同技术的 HMI。这由 25 名参与者根据焦点讨论得出的评估标准进行评估:可识别性、明确性、交互舒适度和直观可理解性。结果表明,直接指示过马路比车辆状态信息更受欢迎,并且车辆向行人发送的大尺寸基于文本的消息效果更好。为自动化车辆之间的通信生成了 HMI 设计建议,并讨论了外部 HMI 可能补充车辆运动或制动操作等非正式通信策略的程度。