a Georgia State University.
Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Dec;34(4):265-275. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1522547. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
Augmented language systems have become both an integral component of communication intervention programs for children with severe communicative impairments and spurred research on their language and communication development. This study examined intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may influence the language development process for children with developmental disabilities, by exploring the relationship between varying degrees of symbol arbitrariness and extant speech comprehension skills in the discrimination, learning, and use of symbols for communication. For the study, 13 school-aged participants (M = 8.24 [years; months]), with both developmental and language delays, were provided experience with iconic Blissymbols and an arbitrary symbol set of lexigrams via observational computerized experience sessions. There was a modest difference in their ability to learn arbitrary versus iconic symbols. There were no differences if the vocabulary item was unknown prior to the symbol learning experience. These findings suggest that iconicity of a symbol may not be a critical factor in learning a symbol-referent relationship if a target referent is not yet known in comprehension.
增强语言系统已成为严重语言障碍儿童沟通干预计划的一个组成部分,并推动了对其语言和沟通发展的研究。本研究通过探索符号任意性程度与现存言语理解技能之间的关系,考察了影响发展性残疾儿童语言发展过程的内在和外在因素,这些技能在符号的辨别、学习和使用中与沟通有关。在这项研究中,13 名学龄儿童(M=8.24 岁;月),具有发育和语言迟缓,通过观察计算机体验课程,体验了具象 Blissymbols 和任意符号集的 lexigrams。他们学习任意符号和具象符号的能力存在适度差异。如果词汇项在符号学习经验之前是未知的,则没有差异。这些发现表明,如果目标参照在理解中尚不知道,那么符号的具象性可能不是学习符号-参照关系的关键因素。