• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前游离 DNA 筛查检测失败:失败率、唐氏综合征风险及重复检测影响的系统综述。

Prenatal cell-free DNA screening test failures: a systematic review of failure rates, risks of Down syndrome, and impact of repeat testing.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1312-1323. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.22. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2018.22
PMID:30514979
Abstract

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the published literature on test failure rates for the sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma to identify Down syndrome.

METHODS

We searched peer-reviewed English publications with diagnostic results on all pregnancies that provided test failure rates. Data on the odds of failure in Down syndrome and euploid pregnancies and the impact of repeat testing were extracted. Random-effects modeling was then used to identify moderators that could explain variability.

RESULTS

Thirty articles satisfied the inclusion criteria for overall failure rates. Study location (Western and Asian with initial testing, and Western with repeat testing) were significant moderators with failure rates of 3.3, 0.6, and 1.2%, respectively (P = 0.001). The odds ratio for Down syndrome in successful versus failed tests was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.55, I = 0%). Repeat testing from 14 large clinical cohort studies found that 83% (range: 52-100%) of failures were repeated, with 79% (range: 46-97%) being successful.

CONCLUSION

Lower failure rates in Asian studies may be related to not routinely measuring the fetal fraction and to fewer obese women. Repeat cfDNA testing is effective in providing reliable results after initial failures. Protocols for primary cfDNA screening should focus on Down syndrome, with less common and more structurally abnormal trisomy 18 and 13 pregnancies treated as adjuncts.

摘要

目的

我们系统地回顾了已发表的关于母体外周血游离 DNA(cfDNA)测序检测唐氏综合征的文献,以确定其检测失败率。

方法

我们检索了同行评审的英文文献,这些文献提供了所有妊娠的诊断结果,并提供了检测失败率。提取了唐氏综合征和整倍体妊娠失败的可能性以及重复检测的影响的数据。然后使用随机效应模型来确定可以解释变异性的调节因素。

结果

有 30 篇文章符合总体失败率的纳入标准。研究地点(初始检测时的西方和亚洲,以及重复检测时的西方)是显著的调节因素,失败率分别为 3.3%、0.6%和 1.2%(P=0.001)。成功与失败测试中唐氏综合征的比值比为 0.98(95%置信区间:0.62-1.55,I=0%)。来自 14 项大型临床队列研究的重复检测发现,83%(范围:52%-100%)的失败病例被重复检测,其中 79%(范围:46%-97%)为成功。

结论

亚洲研究中的低失败率可能与未常规测量胎儿分数以及肥胖女性较少有关。初次失败后重复 cfDNA 检测可提供可靠的结果。原发性 cfDNA 筛查方案应侧重于唐氏综合征,而较少见且结构更异常的 18 三体和 13 三体妊娠应作为辅助治疗。

相似文献

1
Prenatal cell-free DNA screening test failures: a systematic review of failure rates, risks of Down syndrome, and impact of repeat testing.产前游离 DNA 筛查检测失败:失败率、唐氏综合征风险及重复检测影响的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1312-1323. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.22. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Routine first-trimester screening for fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy: cell-free DNA test contingent on results from combined test.双胎妊娠胎儿三体的常规早孕期筛查:游离 DNA 检测取决于联合检测的结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):208-213. doi: 10.1002/uog.20160. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Contingent first-trimester screening for aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in a Danish clinical setting.在丹麦临床环境中使用游离胎儿 DNA 进行有条件的早孕期筛查非整倍体。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.17562. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
4
Screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood: consequences of a failed result.母体外周血游离 DNA 检测筛查三体的结果失败:后果分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;47(6):698-704. doi: 10.1002/uog.15851. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
5
Cell-free fetal DNA versus maternal serum screening for trisomy 21 in pregnant women with and without assisted reproduction technology: a prospective interventional study.游离胎儿 DNA 检测与母体血清学筛查在辅助生殖技术孕妇与非辅助生殖技术孕妇中 21 三体的应用:一项前瞻性干预性研究。
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1346-1353. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.4. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies with cell-free DNA using the IONA test: a prospective multicenter study.应用 IONA 测试的双胎妊娠游离胎儿 DNA 非侵入性产前筛查:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):79.e1-79.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis.母体血液游离 DNA 分析在非整倍体筛查中的应用:更新的荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;50(3):302-314. doi: 10.1002/uog.17484. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Cell-free fetal DNA analysis in maternal plasma as screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancy.母体外周血游离胎儿 DNA 分析在双胎妊娠中作为 21、18 和 13 三体的筛查试验。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):318-324. doi: 10.1002/uog.18838. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
9
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: (1) Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening.韩国母胎医学会产前非整倍体筛查和诊断检测临床实践指南:(1)产前非整倍体筛查。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jan 25;36(4):e27. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e27.
10
Cell-Free DNA Analysis in Maternal Blood: Differences in Estimates between Laboratories with Different Methodologies Using a Propensity Score Approach.游离细胞 DNA 分析在母体外周血中的应用:使用倾向评分法比较不同方法学实验室间的差异
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(5):302-311. doi: 10.1159/000489124. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Counseling prior to cfDNA screening: are we giving the right numbers?cfDNA筛查前的咨询:我们提供的数字正确吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08108-1.
2
Hierarchical Classification of Factors Associated With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Failures and Its Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes.与无创产前检测失败相关因素的分层分类及其对妊娠结局的影响
Matern Fetal Med. 2024 Oct 11;6(4):215-224. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000248. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Insights into non-informative results from non-invasive prenatal screening through gestational age, maternal BMI, and age analyses.
通过对孕龄、母体 BMI 和年龄进行分析,深入了解非侵入性产前筛查的非信息性结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0280858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280858. eCollection 2024.
4
Anticoagulation use is associated with lower fetal fraction and more indeterminate results.抗凝治疗的使用与较低的胎儿分数和更多不确定的结果有关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;230(1):95.e1-95.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
5
Non-Invasive prenatal testing with rolling circle amplification: Real-world clinical experience in a non-molecular laboratory.滚环扩增的无创性产前检测:非分子实验室的真实临床经验。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Mar;37(6):e24870. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24870. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies.全基因组非侵入性产前检测在产前筛查算法中的应用:来自 12700 例妊娠的临床经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04966-8.
7
The effect of hemolysis on quality control metrics for noninvasive prenatal testing.溶血对无创产前检测质量控制指标的影响。
BMC Med Genomics. 2022 Jun 4;15(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01280-2.
8
Antenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities.产前筛查染色体异常。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;305(4):825-835. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06477-5. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
9
Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review.影响无创产前筛查中胎儿游离DNA比例的因素:综述
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jan 27;10:812781. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.812781. eCollection 2022.
10
The impact of maternal autoimmune disease on cell-free DNA test characteristics.母体自身免疫性疾病对游离 DNA 检测特征的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100466. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100466. Epub 2021 Aug 18.