Suppr超能文献

阿尔瓦拉多评分和阑尾炎炎症反应评分能否评估急性阑尾炎的严重程度?

Can Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores evaluate the severity of acute appendicitis?

作者信息

Yeşiltaş Metin, Karakaş Dursun Özgür, Gökçek Berk, Hot Semih, Eğin Seracettin

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):557-562. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.72318.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Alvarado score (AS) and the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score (AIRS) were developed to diagnose acute appendicitis (AA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the severity of AA using the AS and the AIRS tools.

METHODS

Patients who presented between January 2016 and December 2017 and underwent surgery for AA and who had a preoperative AS and AIRS value were evaluated retrospectively. The details of age, sex, pathological severity, the presence of local peritonitis or fecaloid, drainage, appendix diameter, and operation type were evaluated according to the AS and the AIRS.

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients were included in the study. Appendicitis was the most common pathological severity classification (44.4%). The most common appendix diameter group was 7-10 mm (59.2%). The difference observed in the AS and AIRS results for all of the pathological severity categories was statistically significant (p<0.05). The AIRS revealed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in the detection of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. The AIRS difference was statistically significant for appendix diameter (p<0.05). The AS and the AIRS results were both statistically significant for drainage (p<0.05). The AS was correlated with pathological severity, local peritonitis, and drainage, while the AIRS was correlated with pathological severity, uncomplicated/complicated determination, appendix diameter, and drainage (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the AS and the AIRS can evaluate pathological severity, but only the AIRS can evaluate complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis and the diameter of the appendix. These tools can be used to reduce the number of unnecessary radiological or surgical interventions.

摘要

背景

阿尔瓦拉多评分(AS)和阑尾炎炎症反应评分(AIRS)用于诊断急性阑尾炎(AA)。本研究旨在使用AS和AIRS工具评估AA的严重程度。

方法

回顾性评估2016年1月至2017年12月期间因AA接受手术且术前有AS和AIRS值的患者。根据AS和AIRS评估年龄、性别、病理严重程度、局部腹膜炎或粪石的存在、引流情况、阑尾直径和手术类型等细节。

结果

本研究共纳入578例患者。阑尾炎是最常见的病理严重程度分类(44.4%)。最常见的阑尾直径组为7-10毫米(59.2%)。在所有病理严重程度类别中,AS和AIRS结果的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。AIRS在单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的检测中显示出统计学意义上的差异(p<0.05)。AIRS在阑尾直径方面的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。AS和AIRS结果在引流方面均具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。AS与病理严重程度、局部腹膜炎和引流相关,而AIRS与病理严重程度、单纯性/复杂性判定、阑尾直径和引流相关(p<0.05)。

结论

AS和AIRS均可评估病理严重程度,但只有AIRS可评估复杂性或单纯性阑尾炎以及阑尾直径。这些工具可用于减少不必要的放射学或手术干预次数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验