Rabinstein Alejandro A
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Dec;24(6):1708-1731. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000666.
This article discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients who are comatose and reviews the current knowledge on prognosis from various causes of coma. This article also provides an overview of the principles for determination of brain death as well as advice on how to avoid common pitfalls.
Technologic advances have refined our understanding of the physiology of consciousness and the spectrum of disorders of consciousness; they also promise to improve our prognostic accuracy. Yet the clinical principles for the evaluation and treatment of coma remain unaltered. The clinical standards for determination of death by neurologic criteria (ie, brain death) are also well established, although variabilities in local protocols and legal requirements remain a problem to be resolved.
Effective evaluation of coma demands a systematic approach relying on clinical information to ensure rational use of laboratory and imaging tests. When the cause of coma is deemed irreversible in the setting of a catastrophic brain injury and no clinical evidence exists for brain and brainstem function, patients should be evaluated for the possibility of brain death by following the clinical criteria specified in the American Academy of Neurology guidelines.
本文讨论昏迷患者的诊断和治疗方法,并回顾目前关于各种昏迷原因预后的知识。本文还概述了脑死亡判定原则以及如何避免常见陷阱的建议。
技术进步加深了我们对意识生理学和意识障碍谱系的理解;它们也有望提高我们的预后准确性。然而,昏迷评估和治疗的临床原则仍未改变。尽管当地方案和法律要求存在差异仍是有待解决的问题,但通过神经学标准(即脑死亡)判定死亡的临床标准也已确立。
有效的昏迷评估需要一种系统方法,依靠临床信息确保合理使用实验室和影像学检查。当在灾难性脑损伤情况下昏迷原因被认为不可逆转且没有脑和脑干功能的临床证据时,应按照美国神经病学学会指南规定的临床标准对患者进行脑死亡可能性评估。