Suppr超能文献

耳部异物取出:没有一种适用于所有情况的方法。

Aural foreign body removal: there is no one-size-fits-all method.

作者信息

Ng Tian-Tee

机构信息

ENT Unit, Department of Surgery, Frankston Hospital. Peninsula Health, Frankston 3199, VIC, Australia,

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 8;10:177-182. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S178850. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Managing patients with aural foreign body (AFB) may pose a dilemma regarding which removal technique to use for different AFB types. The current study comprises a review of all the possible methods one could employ in removing AFB. My aim was to describe the best methods for different types of AFBs, complete with a description of the method and tool(s) required, and descriptions of the AFBs for which they are best used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical literature published between 2000 and 2016 was reviewed using Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus to compile a list of all published AFB removal methods.

RESULTS

Ten methods were identified and described, each having their own advantages for different AFBs. Patients normally permit very few attempts, so the first AFB removal attempt should ideally be the only one.

CONCLUSION

There is no single method guaranteed to work with all AFBs, so this report also contains a flowchart to aid deciding which technique to use.

摘要

背景

对于耳部异物(AFB)患者的处理,在针对不同类型的AFB采用何种取出技术方面可能会面临两难境地。当前研究包括对所有可能用于取出AFB的方法进行综述。我的目的是描述针对不同类型AFB的最佳方法,详细说明所需的方法和工具,以及最适合使用这些方法的AFB类型。

材料与方法

使用Medline、Cinahl、Embase、Cochrane、PubMed和Scopus对2000年至2016年间发表的医学文献进行综述,以编制所有已发表的AFB取出方法列表。

结果

确定并描述了十种方法,每种方法对不同的AFB都有其自身的优势。患者通常允许尝试的次数很少,因此理想情况下,首次取出AFB的尝试应该是唯一的一次。

结论

没有一种方法能保证适用于所有AFB,因此本报告还包含一个流程图,以帮助确定使用哪种技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/6233696/215e8aff96fa/oaem-10-177Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验