Suppr超能文献

宫腔镜检查用于治疗与疑似子宫腔主要异常相关的不孕症。

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.

作者信息

Bosteels Jan, van Wessel Steffi, Weyers Steven, Broekmans Frank J, D'Hooghe Thomas M, Bongers M Y, Mol Ben Willem J

机构信息

Academic Centre for General Practice, Cochrane Belgium, Kapucijnenvoer 33, blok J bus 7001, Leuven, Belgium, 3000.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 5;12(12):CD009461. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009461.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational studies suggest higher pregnancy rates after the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions, which are present in 10% to 15% of women seeking treatment for subfertility.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions suspected on ultrasound, hysterosalpingography, diagnostic hysteroscopy or any combination of these methods in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility or prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from their inception to 16 April 2018; The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online, ; MEDLINE, Embase , CINAHL , and other electronic sources of trials including trial registers, sources of unpublished literature, and reference lists. We handsearched the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) conference abstracts and proceedings (from 1 January 2014 to 12 May 2018) and we contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.Primary outcomes were live birth and hysteroscopy complications. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy and miscarriage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies met the inclusion criteria.1. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.In women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and submucous fibroids, we were uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to expectant management (odds ratio (OR) 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 6.17; P = 0.06, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improves the miscarriage rate compared to expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.00; P = 0.47, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth or hysteroscopy complication rates. We found no studies in women with endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum for this randomised comparison.2. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.The hysteroscopic removal of polyps prior to IUI may have improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic hysteroscopy only: if 28% of women achieved a clinical pregnancy without polyp removal, the evidence suggested that 63% of women (95% CI 45% to 89%) achieved a clinical pregnancy after the hysteroscopic removal of the endometrial polyps (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.45 to 7.96; P < 0.00001, 204 women; low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth, hysteroscopy complication or miscarriage rates in women with endometrial polyps prior to IUI. We found no studies in women with submucous fibroids, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum prior to IUI or in women with all types of suspected uterine cavity abnormalities prior to IVF/ICSI.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty remains concerning an important benefit with the hysteroscopic removal of submucous fibroids for improving the clinical pregnancy rates in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility. The available low-quality evidence suggests that the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps suspected on ultrasound in women prior to IUI may improve the clinical pregnancy rate compared to simple diagnostic hysteroscopy. More research is needed to measure the effectiveness of the hysteroscopic treatment of suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities in women with unexplained subfertility or prior to IUI, IVF or ICSI.

摘要

背景

观察性研究表明,宫腔镜切除子宫内膜息肉、黏膜下肌瘤、子宫纵隔或宫腔粘连后妊娠率较高,在寻求治疗不育症的女性中,这些情况占10%至15%。

目的

评估在超声、子宫输卵管造影、诊断性宫腔镜检查或这些方法的任何组合怀疑存在子宫内膜息肉、黏膜下肌瘤、子宫纵隔或宫腔粘连的情况下,对不明原因不育或在宫内人工授精(IUI)、体外受精(IVF)或卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)之前的女性进行宫腔镜切除这些病变的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了以下数据库,从其创建至2018年4月16日;Cochrane妇科与生育组专业注册库、Cochrane在线研究中央注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL以及其他试验电子来源,包括试验注册库、未发表文献来源和参考文献列表。我们手工检索了美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)会议摘要和论文集(从2014年1月1日至2018年5月12日),并联系了该领域的专家。

入选标准

宫腔镜手术与对照针对与怀疑的主要子宫腔异常相关的不明原因不育进行随机对照。宫腔镜手术与对照针对辅助生殖之前怀疑的主要子宫腔异常进行随机对照。主要结局为活产和宫腔镜并发症。次要结局为妊娠和流产。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估纳入研究及偏倚风险,并提取数据。我们联系研究作者获取更多信息。

主要结果

两项研究符合纳入标准。1. 宫腔镜手术与对照针对与怀疑的主要子宫腔异常相关的不明原因不育进行随机对照。在不明原因不育且有黏膜下肌瘤的女性中,与期待治疗相比,我们不确定宫腔镜下肌瘤切除术是否提高了临床妊娠率(优势比(OR)2.44,95%置信区间(CI)0.97至6.17;P = 0.06,94名女性;极低质量证据)。与期待治疗相比,我们不确定宫腔镜下肌瘤切除术是否降低了流产率(OR 1.54,95% CI 0.47至5.00;P = 0.47,94名女性;极低质量证据)。我们未找到关于活产或宫腔镜并发症发生率的数据。对于该随机对照,我们未找到针对有子宫内膜息肉、宫腔粘连或子宫纵隔女性的研究。2. 宫腔镜手术与对照针对辅助生殖之前怀疑的主要子宫腔异常进行随机对照。与仅进行诊断性宫腔镜检查相比,IUI前宫腔镜切除息肉可能提高了临床妊娠率:如果28%未切除息肉的女性实现了临床妊娠,证据表明63%(95% CI 45%至89%)的女性在宫腔镜切除子宫内膜息肉后实现了临床妊娠(OR 4.41,95% CI 2.45至7.96;P < 0.00001,204名女性;低质量证据)。我们未找到IUI前有子宫内膜息肉女性的活产、宫腔镜并发症或流产率的数据。我们未找到IUI前有黏膜下肌瘤、宫腔粘连或子宫纵隔女性或IVF/ICSI前所有类型怀疑子宫腔异常女性的研究。

作者结论

对于宫腔镜切除黏膜下肌瘤以提高不明原因不育女性临床妊娠率的重要益处仍存在不确定性。现有低质量证据表明,与单纯诊断性宫腔镜检查相比,IUI前超声怀疑有子宫内膜息肉的女性进行宫腔镜切除可能提高临床妊娠率。需要更多研究来衡量宫腔镜治疗不明原因不育女性或IUI、IVF或ICSI之前怀疑的主要子宫腔异常的有效性。

相似文献

5
Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.针对男性生育力低下的辅助生殖技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD000360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360.pub5.
6
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的体外受精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 19;2015(11):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub4.
7
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育症的宫腔内人工授精
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 3;3(3):CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6.
8
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的宫内人工授精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 19;2:CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5.

引用本文的文献

9
Surgery and minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids.子宫肌瘤的手术及微创治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD015650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015650.

本文引用的文献

5
The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017.《国际不孕不育和生育保健词汇表》,2017 年。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
7
Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus.对患有纵隔子宫的育龄期女性进行纵隔切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1(1):CD008576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub4.
8
Antibiotics Prophylaxis for Operative Hysteroscopy.宫腔镜手术的抗生素预防
Reprod Sci. 2017 Apr;24(4):534-538. doi: 10.1177/1933719116660848. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验