1 The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
2 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May;160(5):876-884. doi: 10.1177/0194599818817762. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
To evaluate voice outcomes of medialization laryngoplasty in the elderly population (65 years and older) and to identify swallow outcomes, complication rates, and predictors of voice outcomes.
Case series with chart review.
Two tertiary academic medical centers.
We retrospectively reviewed charts of 136 patients age 65 years and older undergoing medialization laryngoplasty between January 2008 and May 2016 at 2 tertiary academic institutions. Primary outcome was assessed using Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10) score and Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) score. Secondary outcomes were assessed using the Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10) when dysphagia was present, stroboscopic analysis of glottic closure, and complication rates. A logistic regression analysis assessed predictors of voice improvement after medialization laryngoplasty.
Total GRBAS and VHI-10 scores showed a significant improvement postoperatively ( P < .05). A ≥20% improvement was seen in 81.6% of patients, and a ≥50% improvement was seen in 53.7%. No patient had major complications. Minor complications occurred in 5.9% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified preoperative injection augmentation as an independent predictor of less improvement in VHI-10 score ( P = .015). Voice therapy prior to medialization did not affect voice outcomes ( P = .640).
Patient- and provider-perceived voice quality are significantly improved after medialization laryngoplasty in the elderly, and the procedure is associated with a low complication rate even in an elderly cohort. Improvement in patient-perceived voice outcomes after medialization laryngoplasty was diminished in patients with preoperative injection augmentation.
评估老年人群(65 岁及以上)行声带内移术的嗓音效果,并确定吞咽效果、并发症发生率和嗓音效果的预测因素。
病例系列,病历回顾。
两个三级学术医疗中心。
我们回顾了 2008 年 1 月至 2016 年 5 月在 2 个三级学术机构行声带内移术的 136 例年龄 65 岁及以上患者的病历。主要结局评估采用嗓音障碍指数 10 分(VHI-10)和嗓音障碍严重程度分级、粗糙度、粗糙声、气息声、嘶哑声(GRBAS)评分。当存在吞咽困难时,采用进食评估问卷 10 分(EAT-10)评估次要结局,行频闪喉镜分析声门闭合,并记录并发症发生率。采用逻辑回归分析评估声带内移术后嗓音改善的预测因素。
总 GRBAS 和 VHI-10 评分术后均显著改善(P<0.05)。81.6%的患者改善≥20%,53.7%的患者改善≥50%。无患者发生重大并发症。5.9%的患者出现轻微并发症。多变量逻辑回归分析确定术前注射增强是 VHI-10 评分改善较小的独立预测因素(P=0.015)。声带内移术前行嗓音治疗不影响嗓音效果(P=0.640)。
老年患者行声带内移术后患者和医生感知的嗓音质量显著改善,即使在老年患者中,该手术的并发症发生率也较低。术前注射增强的患者行声带内移术后患者感知嗓音效果的改善程度降低。