• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较接受物理治疗与常规护理的急诊科腰背和颈部疼痛就诊患者的镇痛药物处方。

A comparison of analgesic prescribing among ED back and neck pain visits receiving physical therapy versus usual care.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Hospital & Authority, Denver, CO, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1322-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.009
PMID:30528050
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physical therapy (PT) is commonly cited as a non-opioid pain strategy, and previous studies indicate PT reduces opioid utilization in outpatients with back pain. No study has yet examined whether PT is associated with lower analgesic prescribing in the ED setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of discharged ED visits with a primary ICD-10 diagnosis relating to back or neck pain from 10/1/15 to 2/21/17 at an urban academic ED. Visits receiving a PT evaluation were matched with same-date visits receiving usual care. We compared the primary outcomes of opioid and benzodiazepine prescribing between the two cohorts using chi-squared test and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

74 ED visits received PT during the study period; these visits were matched with 390 same-date visits receiving usual care. Opioid prescribing among ED-PT visits was not significantly higher compared to usual care visits on both unadjusted analysis (50% vs 42%, p = 0.19) and adjusted analysis (adjOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.48-2.28). However, benzodiazepine prescribing among ED-PT visits was significantly higher than usual care visits on both unadjusted (45% vs 23%, p < 0.001) and adjusted analysis (adjOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.50-8.83).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center study, ED back and neck pain visits receiving PT were no less likely to receive an opioid prescription and were more likely to receive a benzodiazepine than visits receiving usual care. Although prior studies demonstrate that PT may reduce opioid utilization in the subsequent year, these results indicate that analgesic prescribing is not reduced at the initial ED encounter.

摘要

目的

物理治疗(PT)通常被认为是一种非阿片类疼痛策略,先前的研究表明,PT 可减少门诊腰痛患者的阿片类药物使用。尚无研究探讨 PT 是否与 ED 环境中阿片类药物处方量降低有关。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2017 年 2 月 21 日期间在城市学术 ED 就诊、主要 ICD-10 诊断为背痛或颈痛的出院 ED 就诊。接受 PT 评估的就诊与同日接受常规护理的就诊相匹配。我们通过卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归比较了两组的主要结局,即阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的处方。

结果

在研究期间,74 次 ED 就诊接受了 PT;这些就诊与 390 次同日接受常规护理的就诊相匹配。在未调整分析(50% vs 42%,p=0.19)和调整分析(调整后的优势比 1.05,95%置信区间 0.48-2.28)中,ED-PT 就诊的阿片类药物处方率均不显著高于常规护理就诊。然而,在未调整分析(45% vs 23%,p<0.001)和调整分析(调整后的优势比 3.65,95%置信区间 1.50-8.83)中,ED-PT 就诊的苯二氮䓬类药物处方率均显著高于常规护理就诊。

结论

在这项单中心研究中,接受 PT 的 ED 背痛和颈痛就诊开具阿片类药物处方的可能性并不低于接受常规护理的就诊,且开具苯二氮䓬类药物的可能性更高。尽管先前的研究表明,PT 可能会减少后续一年内的阿片类药物使用,但这些结果表明,在初始 ED 就诊时,阿片类药物的处方并未减少。

相似文献

1
A comparison of analgesic prescribing among ED back and neck pain visits receiving physical therapy versus usual care.比较接受物理治疗与常规护理的急诊科腰背和颈部疼痛就诊患者的镇痛药物处方。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1322-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
2
Benzodiazepine-opioid co-prescribing in a national probability sample of ED encounters.在全国急诊就诊概率样本中苯二氮䓬类药物与阿片类药物的联合处方情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):458-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.054. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Opioid Prescribing in a Cross Section of US Emergency Departments.美国急诊科横断面研究中的阿片类药物处方情况
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;66(3):253-259.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
Relationship of Opioid Prescriptions to Physical Therapy Referral and Participation for Medicaid Patients with New-Onset Low Back Pain.阿片类药物处方与医疗补助计划中新发腰痛患者的物理治疗转诊及参与情况的关系
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):784-794. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170064.
5
Emergency Department Attending Physician Variation in Opioid Prescribing in Low Acuity Back Pain.低 acuity 背痛患者中急诊科主治医生在阿片类药物处方方面的差异 。(注:这里“acuity”可能有误,推测原文可能是“low acuity back pain”表示“轻度背痛” )
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1135-1142. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.7.33306. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Effect of opioid analgesics on emergency department length of stay among low back pain patients in the United States.阿片类镇痛药对美国腰痛患者急诊停留时间的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1802-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
7
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions at Emergency Department Visits for Conditions Commonly Associated with Prescription Drug Abuse.急诊科就诊时因常见于与处方药滥用相关病症的阿片类药物处方中的种族-族裔差异。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):e0159224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159224. eCollection 2016.
8
Interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: United States Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing, 2006-2010.解读美国国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006 - 2010年美国急诊科阿片类药物处方情况
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):159-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12862. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
9
Clinical Knowledge and Trends in Physicians' Prescribing of Opioids for New Onset Back Pain, 2009-2017.2009 - 2017年医生针对新发背痛开具阿片类药物的临床知识与趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115328. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15328.
10
Prevalence, predictors and trends of opioid prescribing for lower back pain in United States emergency departments.美国急诊室下腰痛阿片类药物处方的流行率、预测因素和趋势。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Jun;46(3):698-704. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13324. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying a sustainability perspective in the literature on physical therapy in relation to pharmaceuticals: a scoping review.在物理治疗与药物相关文献中应用可持续性视角:一项范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1509677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1509677. eCollection 2024.
2
Association between chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy and benzodiazepine prescription in patients with radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study using real-world data from the USA.脊骨神经医学推拿疗法与苯二氮䓬类药物处方用于神经根性腰痛患者的相关性:一项基于美国真实世界数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e058769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058769.
3
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
评价减少急诊科出院患者阿片类药物处方干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425.
4
Relationships between physical therapy intervention and opioid use: A scoping review.物理治疗干预与阿片类药物使用之间的关系:范围综述。
PM R. 2022 Jul;14(7):837-854. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12654. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
A Prospective Observational Study of Emergency Department-Initiated Physical Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain.一项针对急诊科启动的急性腰痛物理治疗的前瞻性观察研究。
Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa219.
6
Real-World Evidence in Prescription Medication Use Among U.S. Adults with Neck Pain.美国颈部疼痛成年人处方药使用的真实世界证据。
Pain Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):637-655. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00193-1. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Dedicated emergency department physical therapy is associated with reduced imaging, opioid administration, and length of stay: A prospective observational study.专门的急诊部物理治疗与减少影像检查、阿片类药物的使用和住院时间有关:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231476. eCollection 2020.