Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa219.
Low back pain accounts for nearly 4 million emergency department (ED) visits annually and is a significant source of disability. Physical therapy has been suggested as a potentially effective nonopioid treatment for low back pain; however, no studies to our knowledge have yet evaluated the emerging resource of ED-initiated physical therapy. The study objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and patients receiving usual care for acute low back pain.
This was a prospective observational study of ED patients receiving either physical therapy or usual care for acute low back pain from May 1, 2018, to May 24, 2019, at a single academic ED (>91,000 annual visits). The primary outcome was pain-related functioning, assessed with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (PROMIS-PI) scores. The secondary outcome was use of high-risk medications (opioids, benzodiazepines, and skeletal muscle relaxants). Outcomes were compared over 3 months using adjusted linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models.
For 101 participants (43 receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and 58 receiving usual care), the median age was 40.5 years and 59% were women. Baseline outcome scores in the ED-initiated physical therapy group were higher than those in the usual care group (ODI = 51.1 vs 36.0; PROMIS-PI = 67.6 vs 62.7). Patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy had greater improvements in both ODI and PROMIS-PI scores at the 3-month follow-up (ODI = -14.4 [95% CI = -23.0 to -5.7]; PROMIS-PI = -5.1 [95% CI = -9.9 to -0.4]) and lower use of high-risk medications (odds ratio = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.01 to 0.58]).
In this single-center observational study, ED-initiated physical therapy for acute low back pain was associated with improvements in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications compared with usual care; the causality of these relationships remains to be explored.
ED-initiated physical therapy is a promising therapy for acute low back pain that may reduce reliance on high-risk medications while improving patient-reported outcomes.
Emergency department-initiated physical therapy for low back pain was associated with greater improvement in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications over 3 months.
腰痛每年导致近 400 万次急诊(ED)就诊,是残疾的重要来源。物理疗法已被建议作为腰痛的一种潜在有效非阿片类治疗方法;然而,据我们所知,尚无研究评估 ED 启动的物理疗法这一新兴资源。本研究的目的是比较接受 ED 启动的物理疗法和接受急性腰痛常规护理的患者的患者报告结果。
这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于 2018 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 24 日在一家学术性 ED(每年就诊量超过 91,000 次)对接受物理疗法或常规护理的急性腰痛患者进行,共纳入 101 名患者(43 名接受 ED 启动的物理疗法,58 名接受常规护理)。主要结局指标为腰痛相关功能,采用 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和患者报告结局测量信息系统疼痛干扰(PROMIS-PI)评分评估。次要结局指标为使用高危药物(阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物和骨骼肌松弛剂)的情况。使用调整后的线性混合和广义估计方程模型在 3 个月时比较结局。
对于 101 名参与者(43 名接受 ED 启动的物理疗法和 58 名接受常规护理),中位年龄为 40.5 岁,59%为女性。ED 启动的物理疗法组的基线结局评分高于常规护理组(ODI=51.1,36.0;PROMIS-PI=67.6,62.7)。接受 ED 启动的物理疗法的患者在 3 个月随访时 ODI 和 PROMIS-PI 评分均有更大的改善(ODI=-14.4[95%CI=-23.0 至-5.7];PROMIS-PI=-5.1[95%CI=-9.9 至-0.4]),且使用高危药物的情况更少(比值比=0.05[95%CI=0.01 至 0.58])。
在这项单中心观察性研究中,与常规护理相比,ED 启动的急性腰痛物理疗法与功能改善和高危药物使用减少相关;这些关系的因果关系仍有待探索。
ED 启动的物理疗法是一种有前途的腰痛治疗方法,可减少对高危药物的依赖,同时改善患者报告的结局。
腰痛的 ED 启动的物理疗法在 3 个月内与功能改善和高危药物使用减少相关。