Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, United States of America.
Neuroscience Program, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, United States of America.
Horm Behav. 2019 May;111:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
This is a contribution to SI: SBN/ICN meeting. In social species, relationships may form between mates, parents and their offspring, and/or social peers. Prairie voles and meadow voles both form selective relationships for familiar same-sex peers, but differ in mating system, allowing comparison of the properties of peer and mate relationships. Prairie vole mate bonds are dopamine-dependent, unlike meadow vole peer relationships, indicating potential differences in the mechanisms and motivation supporting these relationships within and/or across species. We review the role of dopamine signaling in affiliative behavior, and assess the role of behavioral reward across relationship types. We compared the reinforcing properties of mate versus peer relationships within a species (prairie voles), and peer relationships across species (meadow and prairie voles). Social reinforcement was assessed using the socially conditioned place preference test. Animals were conditioned using randomly assigned, equally preferred beddings associated with social (CS+) and solitary (CS-) housing. Prairie vole mates, but not prairie or meadow vole peers, conditioned toward the social cue. A second study in peers used counter-conditioning to enhance the capacity to detect low-level conditioning. Time spent on CS+ bedding significantly decreased in meadow voles, and showed a non-significant increase in prairie voles. These data support the conclusion that mate relationships are rewarding for prairie voles. Despite selectivity of preferences for familiar individuals in partner preference tests, peer relationships in both species appear only weakly reinforcing or non-reinforcing. This suggests important differences in the pathways underlying these relationship types, even within species.
这是对 SI: SBN/ICN 会议的贡献。在社会性物种中,关系可能在配偶、父母及其后代和/或社会同伴之间形成。草原田鼠和草地田鼠都与熟悉的同性同伴形成选择性关系,但交配系统不同,这允许比较同伴和配偶关系的性质。草原田鼠的伴侣关系依赖于多巴胺,而不同于草地田鼠的同伴关系,这表明在同一物种内或跨物种支持这些关系的机制和动机可能存在差异。我们回顾了多巴胺信号在亲和行为中的作用,并评估了行为奖励在不同关系类型中的作用。我们比较了同一物种(草原田鼠)内伴侣关系与同伴关系的强化特性,以及不同物种(草地田鼠和草原田鼠)之间的同伴关系。使用社交条件位置偏好测试评估社交强化。使用与社交(CS+)和独居(CS-)住房相关的随机分配、同等偏好的被褥对动物进行条件作用。只有草原田鼠的伴侣,而不是草原田鼠或草地田鼠的同伴,对社交线索产生了条件反应。在同伴关系中进行的第二项研究使用了反向条件作用来增强检测低水平条件作用的能力。草地田鼠在 CS+床上的时间显著减少,而草原田鼠则显示出非显著增加。这些数据支持草原田鼠的伴侣关系是有奖励的结论。尽管在配偶偏好测试中对熟悉个体的偏好具有选择性,但这两个物种的同伴关系似乎只有微弱的强化或非强化作用。这表明即使在同一物种内,这些关系类型的基础途径也存在重要差异。