Suppr超能文献

Antisepsis for blood culture extraction. Blood culture contamination rate.

作者信息

Ramirez Galleymore P, Gordón Sahuquillo M

机构信息

Unidad de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, España; Centro de Investigación Biomedica En Red-Enfermedades Respiratorias (CibeRes, CB06/06/0028), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.

Unidad de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, España.

出版信息

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;43 Suppl 1:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Abstract

Blood cultures are the gold standard for the etiological diagnosis of bacteremia, though false-positive results are relatively frequent primarily due to contamination from skin flora during sample extraction. Correct skin antisepsis is important for reducing the bacterial load and opportunities for contamination. However, there is currently no solid consensus on the best antiseptic method. Alcohol has a potent immediate bactericidal effect, and there is some scientific evidence in favor of its combination with chlorhexidine, but most studies on this issue are heterogeneous and with inconclusive results. Some authors even suggest that the chosen antiseptic is irrelevant to the contamination rate, provided the blood culture extraction method is adequate and is performed by a trained professional. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验