Suppr超能文献

体外细胞治疗(ELAD)与标准治疗方案在一项治疗中国慢性肝衰竭急性发作患者的随机对照临床试验中的比较。

Comparison of extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD) vs standard of care in a randomized controlled clinical trial in treating Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

作者信息

Duan Zhongping, Xin Shaojie, Zhang Jing, You Shaoli, Chen Yu, Liu Hongling, Zheng Sujun, Li Zheng, Ashley Robert, Millis Michael

机构信息

Artificial Liver Center, Beijing You'an Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,

Department of Infectious Disease, Division III, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China,

出版信息

Hepat Med. 2018 Nov 16;10:139-152. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S180246. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy of an extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD) has been demonstrated in subjects with acute forms of liver failure. This study compared ELAD with standard of care in Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), predominantly secondary to chronic viral hepatitis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to either the ELAD group or the control group. All subjects received plasma exchange and venovenous hemofiltration and either ELAD treatment for 3-5 days, unless terminated early, along with standard of care or standard of care alone (control) and were then followed up for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-nine subjects (ELAD subjects, 32; controls, 17) were randomized under this protocol. Kaplan-Meier analysis of transplant-free survival (TFS) revealed a significant difference in favor of ELAD vs control (=0.049, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There was a significant difference in TFS on day 28 in ELAD vs control (=0.022). In a multiple regression model, the relationship between group assignment and outcome was significant (=0.031) when changes in food intake and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at screening were included as additional independent variables. The duration of ELAD treatment alone was a significant predictor of TFS (=0.043). Median time to a 5-point increase in MELD, transplant, or death was longer than 72 days with ELAD vs 26 days for control (=0.036). Total bilirubin level decreased by 25% during ELAD treatment vs 37% increase in the control group (<0.001) over an equivalent period. Adverse events attributed to the ELAD system were expected and could be managed conservatively. Intergroup differences in certain vital signs and laboratory parameters were noted during treatment and generally resolved posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

ELAD treatment was well tolerated by Chinese subjects with ACLF, predominately secondary to chronic viral hepatitis. Results demonstrate a significant improvement in TFS in ELAD vs control groups in association with significant improvements in serum bilirubin levels presumably related to improvement in hepatic function.

摘要

背景

体外细胞疗法(ELAD)在急性肝衰竭患者中的安全性和有效性已有初步证据。本研究比较了ELAD与中国慢性加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者(主要继发于慢性病毒性肝炎)的标准治疗方法。

受试者与方法

符合入选标准的受试者被随机分为ELAD组或对照组。所有受试者均接受血浆置换和静脉-静脉血液滤过,ELAD组受试者接受3至5天的ELAD治疗(除非提前终止),并同时接受标准治疗,而对照组仅接受标准治疗,之后对所有受试者进行12周的随访。

结果

按照本方案,49名受试者(ELAD组32名;对照组17名)被随机分组。Kaplan-Meier无移植生存(TFS)分析显示,ELAD组与对照组相比有显著差异(P=0.049,Wilcoxon符号秩检验)。ELAD组与对照组在第28天时的TFS有显著差异(P=0.022)。在多元回归模型中,当将筛查时食物摄入量的变化和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分作为额外的自变量纳入时,分组与结局之间的关系具有显著性(P=0.031)。仅ELAD治疗的持续时间是TFS的显著预测因素(P=0.043)。与对照组的26天相比,ELAD组MELD评分增加5分、进行移植或死亡的中位时间超过72天(P=0.036)。在相同时间段内,ELAD治疗期间总胆红素水平下降了25%,而对照组则升高了37%(P<0.001)。ELAD系统导致的不良事件在预期范围内,且可保守处理。治疗期间注意到某些生命体征和实验室参数的组间差异,这些差异在治疗后通常会消失。

结论

中国ACLF患者(主要继发于慢性病毒性肝炎)对ELAD治疗耐受性良好。结果表明,与对照组相比,ELAD组的TFS有显著改善,同时血清胆红素水平也有显著改善,这可能与肝功能改善有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验