• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Impact of Social Pensions on Intergenerational Relationships: Comparative Evidence from China.社会养老金对代际关系的影响:来自中国的比较证据
J Econ Ageing. 2018 Nov;12:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
Old age pension and intergenerational living arrangements: a regression discontinuity design.养老金与代际居住安排:一项回归断点设计
Rev Econ Househ. 2017 Jun;15(2):455-476. doi: 10.1007/s11150-015-9304-y. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
3
Who Are the Beneficiaries of China's New Rural Pension Scheme? Sons, Daughters, or Parents?谁是中国新型农村社会养老保险的受益者?儿子、女儿还是父母?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 29;16(17):3159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173159.
4
Do Social Pension Schemes Promote the Mental Health of Rural Middle-Aged and Old Residents? Evidence From China.社会养老金计划是否能促进农村中老年居民的心理健康?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;9:710128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.710128. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of pension income on healthcare utilization of older adults in rural China.养老金收入对中国农村老年人医疗利用的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 26;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01985-5.
6
The transition of eldercare responsibility and traditional filial piety concepts and its urban-rural differences in China: an age-period-cohort analysis from 2006 to 2017.中国养老责任与传统孝道观念的转变及其城乡差异:2006 年至 2017 年的年龄-时期-队列分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 22;24(1):1669. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19175-5.
7
Old Age Support in Urban China: The Role of Pension Schemes, Self-Support Ability and Intergenerational Assistance.中国城市老年人的养老支持:养老金计划、自我支持能力和代际援助的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 30;16(11):1918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111918.
8
The Impact of Social Pension Schemes on the Mental Health of the Chinese Elderly: A Mediating Effect Perspective of Two-Way Intergenerational Support.社会养老金计划对中国老年人心理健康的影响:两代相互支持的中介效应视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;19(14):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148721.
9
Do Social Pensions Affect the Physical and Mental Health of Rural Children in China? An Intergenerational Care Perspective.社会养老金会影响中国农村儿童的身心健康吗?基于代际照料视角的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3949. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073949.
10
Rural pensions, intra-household bargaining, and elderly medical expenditure in China.中国的农村养老金、家庭内讨价还价和老年人医疗支出。
Health Econ. 2023 Oct;32(10):2353-2371. doi: 10.1002/hec.4725. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Interrelationships Among Individual Factors, Family Factors, and Quality of Life in Older Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using Structural Equation Modeling.个体因素、家庭因素与老年中国成年人生活质量的相互关系:使用结构方程模型的横断面研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Oct 28;7:e59818. doi: 10.2196/59818.
2
Effect of Receiving Financial Support from Adult Children on Depression among Older Persons and the Mediating Role of Social Participation.成年子女经济支持对老年人抑郁的影响及社会参与的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;19(19):12974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912974.
3
Does Social Pension Expansion Relieve Depression and Decrease Medical Costs? Evidence From the Rural Elderly in China.社会养老金扩张是否能缓解抑郁并降低医疗费用?来自中国农村老年人的证据。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;67:1604296. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604296. eCollection 2022.
4
Social security expansion and neighborhood cohesion: Evidence from community-living older adults in China.社会保障扩展与邻里凝聚力:来自中国社区老年人的证据。
J Econ Ageing. 2020 Feb;15. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2019.100235. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
Do Public Pensions Improve Mental Wellbeing? Evidence from the New Rural Society Pension Insurance Program.公共养老金是否能改善心理健康?来自新型农村社会养老保险计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2391. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052391.
6
Leaving Money on the Table? Suboptimal Enrollment in the New Social Pension Program in China.把钱留在桌上?中国新型社会养老金计划的参保率未达最优水平
J Econ Ageing. 2020 Feb;15. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2019.100233. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
Public Pension, Labor Force Participation, and Depressive Symptoms across Gender among Older Adults in Rural China: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.公共养老金、劳动力参与率与中国农村老年人群体中性别差异的抑郁症状:一个有调节的中介分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 4;17(9):3193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093193.
8
Who Are the Beneficiaries of China's New Rural Pension Scheme? Sons, Daughters, or Parents?谁是中国新型农村社会养老保险的受益者?儿子、女儿还是父母?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 29;16(17):3159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173159.
9
Does money relieve depression? Evidence from social pension expansions in China.钱能缓解抑郁吗?来自中国社会养老金扩张的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:411-420. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Reducing Food Poverty and Vulnerability among the Rural Elderly with Chronic Diseases: The Role of the New Rural Pension Scheme in China.减少农村慢性病老年人口的食物贫困和脆弱性:中国新型农村社会养老保险的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 13;15(6):1253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061253.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural pensions, intra-household bargaining, and elderly medical expenditure in China.中国的农村养老金、家庭内讨价还价和老年人医疗支出。
Health Econ. 2023 Oct;32(10):2353-2371. doi: 10.1002/hec.4725. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Child Health and Household Resources in South Africa: Evidence from the Old Age Pension Program.南非的儿童健康与家庭资源:来自老年养老金计划的证据
Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(2):393-8. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.393.
3
Risk Protection, Service Use, and Health Outcomes under Colombia's Health Insurance Program for the Poor.哥伦比亚针对贫困人口的医疗保险计划下的风险保护、服务利用及健康结果
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Oct;5(4):61-91. doi: 10.1257/app.5.4.61.
4
Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption.低生育率真的是一个问题吗?人口老龄化、抚养比和消费。
Science. 2014 Oct 10;346(6206):229-34. doi: 10.1126/science.1250542.
5
China's demographic history and future challenges.中国的人口历史和未来挑战。
Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):581-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1209396.
6
DOES MEDICARE SAVE LIVES?医疗保险能挽救生命吗?
Q J Econ. 2009;124(2):597-636. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.597.
7
Labor supply responses to large social transfers: Longitudinal evidence from South Africa.劳动力供给对大规模社会转移支付的反应:来自南非的纵向证据。
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2009 Jan 1;1(1):22-48. doi: 10.1257/app.1.1.22.
8
Family size and support of older adults in urban and rural China: current effects and future implications.中国城乡老年人的家庭规模与赡养情况:当前影响及未来启示
Demography. 2003 Feb;40(1):23-44. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0010.

社会养老金对代际关系的影响:来自中国的比较证据

The Impact of Social Pensions on Intergenerational Relationships: Comparative Evidence from China.

作者信息

Chen Xi, Eggleston Karen, Sun Ang

机构信息

Yale University and IZA.

Stanford University and NBER.

出版信息

J Econ Ageing. 2018 Nov;12:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jeoa.2017.04.001
PMID:30534523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6286058/
Abstract

China launched a new rural pension scheme (hereafter NRPS) for rural residents in 2009, now covering almost all counties with over 400 million people enrolled. This implementation of the largest social pension program in the world offers a unique setting for studying the economics of intergenerational relationships during development, given the rapidity of China's population aging, traditions of filial piety and co-residence, decreasing number of children, and dearth of formal social security, at a relatively low income level. We draw on rich household surveys from two provinces at distinct development stages - impoverished Guizhou and relatively well-off Shandong - to better understand heterogeneity in the impact of pension benefits. Employing a fuzzy regression discontinuity design, we find that around the pension eligibility age cut-off, the NRPS significantly reduces intergenerational co-residence, especially between elderly parents and their adults sons; promotes pensioners' healthcare service consumption; and weakens (but does not supplant) non-pecuniary and pecuniary transfers across three generations. These effects are much larger in less developed Guizhou province.

摘要

中国于2009年为农村居民推出了新型农村社会养老保险(以下简称新农保),目前几乎覆盖了所有县,参保人数超过4亿。鉴于中国人口老龄化速度快、存在孝道和共同居住传统、子女数量减少以及在相对低收入水平下缺乏正式社会保障,这一世界上最大的社会养老保险计划的实施为研究发展过程中的代际关系经济学提供了一个独特的背景。我们利用来自处于不同发展阶段的两个省份——贫困的贵州和相对富裕的山东——丰富的家庭调查数据,以更好地理解养老金福利影响的异质性。采用模糊回归断点设计,我们发现,在养老金领取资格年龄截止点附近,新农保显著减少了代际共同居住情况,尤其是老年父母与其成年儿子之间的共同居住;促进了养老金领取者对医疗服务的消费;并削弱了(但并未取代)三代人之间的非货币和货币转移。这些影响在欠发达的贵州省要大得多。