• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性胸膜间皮瘤的联合治疗模式:采用胸膜外全肺切除术的单中心长期生存分析。

Combined modality treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a single-centre long-term survival analysis using extrapleural pneumonectomy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 1;55(5):934-941. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy385.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezy385
PMID:30535191
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Combined modality treatment (CMT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a matter of debate regarding the choice of surgical procedure: extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication.

METHODS

We performed a prospective interventional cohort study between 2003 and 2014. All consecutive patients with any histological MPM subtype, ≤70 years old, World Health Organization performance status ≤1, medically fit for pneumonectomy and stage cT1-2cN0-2cM0 (TNM7) or lower were included. Eligibility for CMT was discussed by the multidisciplinary tumour board. Our local CMT protocol consisted of induction chemotherapy, followed by EPP and hemithoracic radiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 3 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 day 1), each administered once every 3 weeks. If non-progressive, EPP was performed followed by hemithoracic radiotherapy (most frequently, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; dose 54 Gy/1.8 Gy ± boost). Feasibility and long-term survival analyses were performed. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated from histological confirmation of a diagnosis of MPM.

RESULTS

Out of 197 patients, 97 started with CMT (79 epithelioid, 15 mixed and 3 sarcomatoid tumours, based on histological analysis). Clinical TNM was IA (n = 9)/IB (n = 8)/II (n = 57)/III (n = 23). A total of 76 patients underwent surgery (EPP: n = 56; exploratory thoracotomy: n = 20). The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.6%. Out of 56 patients who underwent surgery, 47 completed the entire CMT protocol. The intent-to-treat median and 5-year OS were 22.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.5-27.9] months and 11.2% (95% CI = 6.9-23.4). In patients who completed the CMT protocol (n = 47), these values were 33.2 (95% CI = 23.0-45.0) months and 24.2% (95% CI = 13.4-43.8). The intent-to-treat median and 5-year DFS were 15.6 (95% CI = 14.0-17.3) months and 9.9% (95% CI = 5.1-19.2), 19.8 (95% CI = 16.8-27.7) months and 17.2% (95% CI = 8.6-34.1) in those who had the full CMT. The Cox proportional hazards model showed a significantly lower DFS in positive lymph nodes (HR 2.79, 95% CI=1.35-5.78; P=0.006). In 30 (64%) patients with epithelioid type MPM without positive lymph nodes (pN0) after EPP, the 5-year DFS was 27.0% (95% CI=14.1-51.7).

CONCLUSIONS

CMT with EPP for MPM is feasible, with an acceptable surgical mortality rate, and results in a 5-year survival rate of 24%. Careful patient selection (staging and physical performance) is extremely important.

摘要

目的

恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的联合治疗(CMT)在手术方式的选择上仍存在争议:胸膜外全肺切除术(EPP)或胸膜切除术/剥脱术。

方法

我们在 2003 年至 2014 年期间进行了一项前瞻性干预性队列研究。所有组织学任何类型的 MPM 亚型、≤70 岁、世界卫生组织表现状态≤1、适合进行全肺切除术且分期为 cT1-2cN0-2cM0(TNM7)或更低的患者均被纳入研究。多学科肿瘤委员会讨论了 CMT 的适应证。我们的局部 CMT 方案包括诱导化疗,随后是 EPP 和半胸部放疗。诱导化疗包括顺铂(75mg/m2,第 1 天)和培美曲塞(500mg/m2,第 1 天)各 3 个周期,每 3 周给药 1 次。如果非进展性,则进行 EPP,随后进行半胸部放疗(最常为调强放疗;剂量 54Gy/1.8Gy± 增敏剂量)。进行了可行性和长期生存分析。总生存和无病生存(DFS)从 MPM 的组织学诊断确认开始计算。

结果

197 例患者中,97 例开始接受 CMT(79 例上皮样,15 例混合性和 3 例肉瘤样肿瘤,基于组织学分析)。临床 TNM 分期为 IA(n=9)/IB(n=8)/II(n=57)/III(n=23)。共有 76 例患者接受了手术(EPP:n=56;探查性剖胸术:n=20)。院内死亡率为 3.6%。56 例接受手术的患者中,47 例完成了整个 CMT 方案。意向治疗的中位总生存时间和 5 年生存率分别为 22.4 个月(95%置信区间 [CI]:15.5-27.9)和 11.2%(95%CI:6.9-23.4)。完成 CMT 方案的患者(n=47),这些值分别为 33.2 个月(95%CI:23.0-45.0)和 24.2%(95%CI:13.4-43.8)。意向治疗的中位和 5 年 DFS 分别为 15.6 个月(95%CI:14.0-17.3)和 9.9%(95%CI:5.1-19.2),19.8 个月(95%CI:16.8-27.7)和 17.2%(95%CI:8.6-34.1),在那些有完整 CMT 的患者中。Cox 比例风险模型显示,淋巴结阳性(HR 2.79,95%CI=1.35-5.78;P=0.006)与 DFS 显著相关。在 30 例(64%)EPP 后无阳性淋巴结(pN0)的上皮样 MPM 患者中,5 年 DFS 为 27.0%(95%CI=14.1-51.7)。

结论

EPP 联合 CMT 治疗 MPM 是可行的,手术死亡率可接受,5 年生存率为 24%。仔细的患者选择(分期和体力状况)非常重要。

相似文献

1
Combined modality treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a single-centre long-term survival analysis using extrapleural pneumonectomy.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的联合治疗模式:采用胸膜外全肺切除术的单中心长期生存分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 1;55(5):934-941. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy385.
2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma with or without hemithoracic radiotherapy (SAKK 17/04): a randomised, international, multicentre phase 2 trial.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的新辅助化疗和胸膜外全肺切除术联合或不联合半胸部放疗 (SAKK 17/04):一项随机、国际、多中心 2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00208-9. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
3
Long-term results in malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.新辅助化疗、胸膜外全肺切除术及调强放疗治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的长期疗效
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec 30;10:267. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0575-5.
4
Outcome for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma referred for Trimodality therapy in Western Australia.西澳大利亚州接受三联疗法的恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的治疗结果。
J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Aug;4(8):1010-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ae25bf.
5
Trimodality strategy for treating malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of a feasibility study of induction pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and postoperative hemithoracic radiation (Japan Mesothelioma Interest Group 0601 Trial).治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的三联疗法策略:培美曲塞联合顺铂诱导化疗后行胸膜外全肺切除术及术后半胸放疗的可行性研究结果(日本间皮瘤研究组0601试验)
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):523-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0925-1. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and postoperative high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II trial.局部晚期恶性胸膜间皮瘤的诱导化疗、胸膜外全肺切除术及术后大剂量放疗:一项II期试验。
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 May;1(4):289-95.
7
Clinical experience of volumetric modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy.胸膜外全肺切除术后容积调强弧形放疗治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的临床经验
J Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;56(2):315-24. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru102. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
8
A feasibility study evaluating Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy: the "SMART" approach for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.评估放疗后行胸膜间皮瘤手术的可行性研究:可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤的 SMART 方法。
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Mar;9(3):397-402. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000078.
9
Factors associated with survival in a large series of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in New South Wales.新南威尔士州大量恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者生存相关因素
Br J Cancer. 2014 Oct 28;111(9):1860-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.478. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
10
Hemithoracic intensity modulated radiation therapy after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma: toxicity, patterns of failure, and a matched survival analysis.恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸膜切除术/胸膜剥脱术后的半胸强度调制放射治疗:毒性、失败模式及配对生存分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.343. Epub 2014 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Current Understanding of the Immune Microenvironment and Treatments of a Rare Disease.恶性胸膜间皮瘤:对一种罕见疾病的免疫微环境及治疗方法的当前认识
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 11;14(18):4415. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184415.
2
Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Limit Diaphragm Motion-A Novel Approach for Definitive Radiation Therapy for Inoperable Pleural Mesothelioma: A Pilot Study.使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)限制膈肌运动——一种用于不可切除胸膜间皮瘤确定性放射治疗的新方法:一项初步研究。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jul 24;10(8):711. doi: 10.3390/biology10080711.
3
High systemic immune-inflammation index represents an unfavorable prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
高全身免疫炎症指数提示恶性胸膜间皮瘤预后不良。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 May 2;11:3973-3979. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S201269. eCollection 2019.