Turnbull Gareth S, Scott Chloe E H, MacDonald Deborah J, Breusch Steffen J
Department of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Clydebank, G81 4DY, UK.
Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Mar;139(3):411-421. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3090-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
Demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) continues to grow worldwide and is expected to more than double within the next 1-2 decades. The primary aim of this study was to examine return to function following revision THA in a UK population.
We assessed 118 patients (132 RTHAs, mean age 65 years SD 13, range 23-88) at a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (SD 4.4) postoperatively. Preoperative age, gender, BMI, social deprivation, operative indication, comorbidities, activity level (UCLA score) and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were recorded. Postoperative UCLA score, OHS, EQ-5D, satisfaction levels and performance in activities of daily living (ADLs) were obtained and univariate and multivariate analysis performed.
Mean UCLA activity score improved following RTHA (p < 0.001): UCLA activity score improved in 37% and was unchanged in 50%; 49% of patients engaged in at least moderate level activities (UCLA score ≥ 6). Patient BMI, gender, age and reason for revision did not influence levels of pain, stiffness or activity at follow-up. Preoperative UCLA activity scores (p < 0.001) independently predicted long-term UCLA scores. Independent predictors (p < 0.05) of poor hip-specific function (OHS) following revision included social deprivation, revision for periprosthetic fracture and lower preoperative OHS. Difficulties with ADLs were associated with increasing deprivation, ≥ 3 comorbidities, and revision for periprosthetic fracture or infection (p < 0.05). Overall, 79% of patients remained satisfied or very satisfied following revision THA. Following RTHA, 10% suffered a dislocation and 13% required reoperation for complications.
Revision THA facilitates long-term return to preoperative levels of physical activity in the majority of patients, though activity levels increase in one-third only. Overall over three-quarters are satisfied with their outcome, but revision for periprosthetic fracture or dislocation gives the worse overall outcomes and lower satisfaction levels.
全髋关节置换翻修术(RTHA)的需求在全球范围内持续增长,预计在未来10至20年内将增加一倍以上。本研究的主要目的是调查英国人群中全髋关节置换翻修术后的功能恢复情况。
我们评估了118例患者(132例全髋关节置换翻修术,平均年龄65岁,标准差13,范围23至88岁),术后平均随访7.9年(标准差4.4)。记录术前年龄、性别、体重指数、社会剥夺程度、手术指征、合并症、活动水平(加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分)和牛津髋关节评分(OHS)。获取术后UCLA评分、OHS、EQ-5D、满意度水平以及日常生活活动(ADL)表现,并进行单因素和多因素分析。
全髋关节置换翻修术后UCLA平均活动评分有所改善(p < 0.001):37%的患者UCLA活动评分提高,50%的患者评分未变;49%的患者至少参与中等强度活动(UCLA评分≥6)。患者的体重指数、性别、年龄和翻修原因对随访时疼痛、僵硬或活动水平没有影响。术前UCLA活动评分(p < 0.001)可独立预测长期UCLA评分。翻修术后髋关节特定功能(OHS)较差的独立预测因素(p < 0.05)包括社会剥夺、假体周围骨折翻修以及术前OHS较低。日常生活活动困难与社会剥夺程度增加、≥3种合并症以及假体周围骨折或感染翻修有关(p < 0.05)。总体而言,79%的患者在全髋关节置换翻修术后仍感到满意或非常满意。全髋关节置换翻修术后,10%的患者发生脱位,13%的患者因并发症需要再次手术。
全髋关节置换翻修术有助于大多数患者长期恢复到术前身体活动水平,不过只有三分之一的患者活动水平有所提高。总体而言,超过四分之三的患者对结果满意,但假体周围骨折或脱位翻修的总体结果较差,满意度较低。