Suppr超能文献

分子系统发育学支持保留原生质体的红藻寄生虫类群:分类学和术语修订。

Molecular phylogenetics supports a clade of red algal parasites retaining native plastids: taxonomy and terminology revised.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02879, USA.

出版信息

J Phycol. 2019 Apr;55(2):279-288. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12823. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

Parasitism is a life strategy that has repeatedly evolved within the Florideophyceae. Historically, the terms adelphoparasite and alloparasite have been used to distinguish parasites based on the relative phylogenetic relationship of host and parasite. However, analyses using molecular phylogenetics indicate that nearly all red algal parasites infect within their taxonomic family, and a range of relationships exist between host and parasite. To date, all investigated adelphoparasites have lost their plastid, and instead, incorporate a host-derived plastid when packaging spores. In contrast, a highly reduced plastid lacking photosynthesis genes was sequenced from the alloparasite Choreocolax polysiphoniae. Here we present the complete Harveyella mirabilis plastid genome, which has also lost genes involved in photosynthesis, and a partial plastid genome from Leachiella pacifica. The H. mirabilis plastid shares more synteny with free-living red algal plastids than that of C. polysiphoniae. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that C. polysiphoniae, H. mirabilis, and L. pacifica form a robustly supported clade of parasites, which retain their own plastid genomes, within the Rhodomelaceae. We therefore transfer all three genera from the exclusively parasitic family, Choreocolacaceae, to the Rhodomelaceae. Additionally, we recommend applying the terms archaeplastic parasites (formerly alloparasites), and neoplastic parasites (formerly adelphoparasites) to distinguish red algal parasites using a biological framework rather than taxonomic affiliation with their hosts.

摘要

寄生是一种在 Florideophyceae 中反复进化的生活策略。历史上,术语 adelphoparasite 和 alloparasite 被用来根据宿主和寄生虫的相对系统发育关系来区分寄生虫。然而,使用分子系统发生学的分析表明,几乎所有的红藻寄生虫都在其分类家族内感染,并且宿主和寄生虫之间存在多种关系。迄今为止,所有研究过的 adelphoparasites 都失去了它们的质体,而是在包装孢子时纳入了宿主衍生的质体。相比之下,从 alloparasite Choreocolax polysiphoniae 中测序得到了一个高度简化的质体,缺乏光合作用基因。在这里,我们展示了完整的 Harveyella mirabilis 质体基因组,它也失去了与光合作用相关的基因,以及 Leachiella pacifica 的部分质体基因组。H. mirabilis 质体与自由生活的红藻质体的同线性比 C. polysiphoniae 的更多。系统发育分析表明,C. polysiphoniae、H. mirabilis 和 L. pacifica 形成了一个支持有力的寄生虫分支,在 Rhodomelaceae 中保留了它们自己的质体基因组。因此,我们将这三个属从专门的寄生虫科 Choreocolacaceae 转移到了 Rhodomelaceae。此外,我们建议使用术语 archaeoplastic parasites(以前称为 alloparasites)和 neoplastic parasites(以前称为 adelphoparasites),根据生物学框架而不是与宿主的分类隶属关系来区分红藻寄生虫。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验