Department of Education, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Psychophysiology. 2019 Apr;56(4):e13311. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13311. Epub 2018 Dec 9.
In a cross-modal rhyming study with visual pseudoword primes and auditory word targets, we found a typical ERP rhyming effect such that nonrhyming targets elicited a larger N400/N450 than rhyming targets. An orthographic effect was also apparent in the same 350- to 600-ms epoch as the phonological effect: The rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did not match their primes' (e.g., tain-"sane") was smaller over the left hemisphere than the rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did match their primes' (e.g., nain-"gain"), although the spellings of the auditory word targets were never explicitly shown. Our results indicate that this cross-modal ERP rhyming effect indexes both phonological and orthographic processing-for auditory stimuli for which no orthography is presented in the task. This pattern of findings is consistent with the notion of coactivation of sublexical orthography and phonology in fluent adult readers as they both read and listen.
在一项视觉假词启动和听觉单词目标的跨模态押韵研究中,我们发现了一个典型的 ERP 押韵效应,即不押韵的目标比押韵的目标诱发更大的 N400/N450。在相同的 350-600 毫秒时程中,还出现了一个拼字效应:与启动词不匹配的押韵目标(例如,tain-"sane")的押韵效应在左半球比与启动词匹配的押韵目标(例如,nain-"gain")的押韵效应小,尽管听觉单词目标的拼写从未在任务中明确显示。我们的结果表明,这种跨模态 ERP 押韵效应既反映了语音处理,也反映了拼字处理——对于听觉刺激,任务中没有呈现拼字。这种发现模式与流畅的成年读者在阅读和聆听时,亚词汇拼字和语音同时激活的概念一致。