McPherson W B, Ackerman P T, Holcomb P J, Dykman R A
Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Brain Lang. 1998 Apr;62(2):163-85. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1893.
Visual and auditory rhyme judgment tasks were administered to adolescent dyslexics and normal readers while event-related brain potentials were recorded. Reading disabled subjects were split into two groups based on a median split of scores on a visual non-word decoding test. The better decoders were called Phonetics and the poorer decoders were referred to as Dysphonetics. Single syllable, real word stimuli were used, and both rhyming and non-rhyming targets had a 50% chance for matching orthography. In the visual paradigm the normal readers exhibited a left frontal CNV before targets, a large reduction in frontal N400 for matching orthography (orthographic priming), and a large reduction in parietal N400 for rhyming targets (phonological priming). Dysphonetics had an intact CNV and orthographic priming, but the group's phonological priming was very reduced. Phonetics showed both orthographic and phonological priming but had a marked reduction in their CNV. In the auditory task, controls showed a left parietal N400 priming effect for rhyming targets. Dysphonetics showed a similar bilateral effect. The Phonetics did not show a normal priming effect, but produced evidence for priming at a longer latency. Additionally, the Phonetic group responded more slowly than either of the other two groups, who responded with similar latencies. These results support the separation of the reading disabled into a group that has difficulty translating orthography into phonology, and a group that is slower functioning and has reduced capacity in preparing for a response.
在记录事件相关脑电位的同时,对青少年诵读困难者和正常阅读者进行了视觉和听觉押韵判断任务。根据视觉非单词解码测试分数的中位数划分,将阅读障碍受试者分为两组。解码能力较好的一组称为语音组,解码能力较差的一组称为发音障碍组。使用单音节真实单词刺激,押韵和不押韵目标在正字法匹配上的概率均为50%。在视觉范式中,正常阅读者在目标出现前左侧额叶出现关联性负变(CNV),对于匹配正字法(正字法启动)额叶N400大幅降低,对于押韵目标(语音启动)顶叶N400大幅降低。发音障碍组的关联性负变和正字法启动正常,但该组的语音启动明显降低。语音组同时表现出正字法和语音启动,但关联性负变明显降低。在听觉任务中,对照组对押韵目标表现出左侧顶叶N400启动效应。发音障碍组表现出类似的双侧效应。语音组未表现出正常的启动效应,但在较长潜伏期出现了启动证据。此外,语音组的反应比其他两组都慢,其他两组的反应潜伏期相似。这些结果支持将阅读障碍者分为一组难以将正字法转换为语音的人群,以及一组功能较慢且准备反应能力降低的人群。