Suppr超能文献

清醒局部麻醉无止血带与全身麻醉有止血带用于桡骨远端骨折掌侧钢板固定的比较

Comparison of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet With General Anesthesia With Tourniquet for Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fracture.

作者信息

Huang Ying-Cheng, Chen Chun-Yu, Lin Kai-Cheng, Yang Shang-Wei, Tarng Yih-Wen, Chang Wei-Ning

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2019 Jan 1;42(1):e93-e98. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20181206-01. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is used for various hand surgeries, but there are no reports of its use for distal radius fractures. The authors compared perioperative variables and clinical outcomes for volar plating for distal radius fractures with WALANT vs general anesthesia with tourniquet. This retrospective study included 47 patients who presented with distal radius fractures between January 2015 and February 2017. Twenty-one underwent surgical volar plating with WALANT, and 26 underwent surgical volar plating with general anesthesia with tourniquet. Patients were followed for 12 months. The 2 groups were compared regarding perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes, including perioperative field pain evaluated by visual analog scale score on postoperative day 1, range of motion 12 months postoperatively, and Mayo wrist score. The WALANT group had a lower mean visual analog scale score and a shorter mean hospitalization (both P<.001), but greater mean blood loss (P<.001). No significant differences were found regarding operative time (P=.214) or time to union (P=.180). At 12-month follow-up, no significant differences were found regarding wrist extension (P=.721), wrist flexion (P=.119), or Mayo wrist score (P=.223). Although both techniques permitted volar plating for distal radius fractures, WALANT allowed immediate intervention and led to less postoperative pain and shorter hospitalization. Although control of blood loss was worse with WALANT, blood loss was limited to a mean of 22.62 mL and did not interfere with the surgical field. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e93-e98.].

摘要

清醒局部麻醉无止血带(WALANT)技术已应用于多种手部手术,但尚无其用于桡骨远端骨折的报道。作者比较了采用WALANT技术与全身麻醉加止血带技术进行桡骨远端骨折掌侧钢板内固定术的围手术期变量和临床结果。这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2017年2月期间出现桡骨远端骨折的47例患者。21例患者采用WALANT技术进行手术掌侧钢板内固定,26例患者采用全身麻醉加止血带技术进行手术掌侧钢板内固定。对患者进行了12个月的随访。比较了两组的围手术期参数和临床结果,包括术后第1天通过视觉模拟评分评估的围手术期术野疼痛、术后12个月的活动范围以及梅奥腕关节评分。WALANT组的平均视觉模拟评分较低,平均住院时间较短(均P<0.001),但平均失血量较多(P<0.001)。在手术时间(P=0.214)或骨折愈合时间(P=0.180)方面未发现显著差异。在12个月的随访中,在腕关节背伸(P=0.721)、腕关节掌屈(P=0.119)或梅奥腕关节评分(P=0.223)方面未发现显著差异。尽管两种技术都可用于桡骨远端骨折的掌侧钢板内固定,但WALANT技术允许立即进行干预,并导致术后疼痛减轻和住院时间缩短。尽管WALANT技术的失血控制较差,但失血量平均为22.62 mL,并未干扰手术视野。[《骨科》。2019;42(1):e93-e98。]

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验