Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul, Seoul 04401, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Gumi, Gumi 39371, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159155.
Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are very common injuries associated with aging, and the number of fractures is increasing with the increase in the elderly population. General anesthesia or brachial plexus block (BPB) is required for fracture fixation, and acute postoperative pain control is necessary after operation. Early pain control can improve patient satisfaction and functional outcomes. In this study, we report the clinical differences in postoperative pain, according to the method of anesthesia (general anesthesia versus brachial plexus block). Volar plating was used to treat 72 patients older than 60 years who had comminuted DRF. Patients were randomized to either group A (36 patients), who underwent general anesthesia, or group B (36 patients), who underwent BPB. We compared these two groups prospectively for acute postoperative pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The VAS scores of each group were: 6.8 ± 2.5 in general anesthesia and 0.5 ± 2.3 in BPB at 2 h, postoperatively; 6.5 ± 2.4 in general anesthesia and 0.5 ± 2.4 in BPB anesthesia at 4 h, postoperatively; 5.2 ± 2.4 in general anesthesia and 1.5 ± 2.4 in BPB anesthesia at 6 h, postoperatively; 4.5 ± 2.5 in general anesthesia and 3.4 ± 2.7 in BPB anesthesia at 12 h, postoperatively; and 3.5 ± 2.5 in general anesthesia and 3.2 ± 2.7 in BPB anesthesia at 24 h, postoperatively. DRF patients with BPB anesthesia showed a lower VAS score than those subjected to general anesthesia in early postoperative period. As a result, the effect of BPB anesthesia on acute pain management after surgery was excellent, which resulted in a lower pain score compared with general anesthesia in DRF patients undergoing volar plating.
桡骨远端骨折(DRF)是一种与年龄相关的常见损伤,随着老年人口的增加,骨折数量也在增加。骨折固定需要全身麻醉或臂丛神经阻滞(BPB),术后需要急性术后疼痛控制。早期疼痛控制可以提高患者满意度和功能结果。在这项研究中,我们报告了根据麻醉方法(全身麻醉与臂丛神经阻滞)术后疼痛的临床差异。采用掌侧钢板治疗 72 例年龄大于 60 岁的粉碎性 DRF 患者。患者随机分为 A 组(36 例)行全身麻醉,B 组(36 例)行 BPB。我们用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较两组患者术后 2、4、6、12 和 24 h 的急性术后疼痛。两组的 VAS 评分分别为:全麻组术后 2 h 为 6.8 ± 2.5,BPB 组为 0.5 ± 2.3;全麻组术后 4 h 为 6.5 ± 2.4,BPB 组为 0.5 ± 2.4;全麻组术后 6 h 为 5.2 ± 2.4,BPB 组为 1.5 ± 2.4;全麻组术后 12 h 为 4.5 ± 2.5,BPB 组为 3.4 ± 2.7;全麻组术后 24 h 为 3.5 ± 2.5,BPB 组为 3.2 ± 2.7。BPB 麻醉的 DRF 患者在术后早期的 VAS 评分低于全身麻醉。结果,BPB 麻醉对术后急性疼痛管理的效果非常好,与掌侧钢板治疗的 DRF 患者全身麻醉相比,疼痛评分较低。