Linda Čapková, Markéta Kalinová, Ivana Tichá, Eva Parobková, Milada Matějčková, Hana Vošmiková, Ondřej Horký, Karolína Bartáková, Jiří Drábek, Monika Bajerová, Pavel Dundr
Klin Onkol. 2018 Fall;31(5):353-360. doi: 10.14735/amko2018353.
Detection of EGFR mutations in tumor tissue represents a standard testing procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Molecular testing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma enables detection of mutations in cases where tumor specimens are unavailable or when monitoring of therapeutic responses is necessary. In addition, according to the recent literature, ctDNA better reflects the heterogeneity of the neoplastic cell population than isolated tumor lesion or metastasis. We report a national interlaboratory evaluation aimed at assessing the analytical quality of ctDNA EGFR testing in plasma across seven reference laboratories in the Czech Republic.
Aliquots of 13 plasma samples were sent to 7 laboratories and consisted of commercially available 2ml plasma specimens of genomic DNA with mutant allelic frequencies of 5, 0.5, 0.05, and 0% of the most common sensitizing mutations (deletion in exon 19, L858R) and the resistance mutation T790M. DNA extraction and EGFR testing were performed according to standard procedures. In 6/7 laboratories the cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 was used. One laboratory employed the Super-ARMS® EGFR Mutation Detection Kit.
In total, 91 genotypes were determined with an overall error rate of 24.2% (22/91). The overall error rates were 3.2% (2/63) for the 0.5% mutation frequency and 0% for the 5% mutation frequency (0/35), respectively. No false positive results were reported. The cobas® method achieved consistent results with the 0.05% mutation frequency for the exon 19 deletion. For L858R and T790M mutations, the threshold was above the 0.5% frequency.
The results show that EGFR testing for ctDNA in plasma has limited sensitivity, especially for detection of the T790M mutation. Particularly, in ctDNA testing of very low mutated DNA plasma fractions (below 0.01%), emphasis should be placed on the use of highly sensitive molecular methods. The outcomes of this quality assessment confirm the need for rebiopsy in patients with negative plasma results because of a higher false negative rate in comparison to tissue testing. Key words: circulating DNA - liquid biopsy - epidermal growth factor receptor - non-small cell lung cancer - quality control This work was supported by grants of AstraZeneca and the project of the Ministry of Health number 00064203 (Motol University Hospital). The authors declare they have no potential confl icts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 4. 6. 2018 Accepted: 1. 8. 2018.
检测肿瘤组织中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变是非小细胞肺癌患者的标准检测程序。对血浆中循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)进行分子检测,能够在无法获取肿瘤标本或需要监测治疗反应的情况下检测出突变。此外,根据最近的文献,ctDNA比分离的肿瘤病变或转移灶能更好地反映肿瘤细胞群体的异质性。我们报告了一项全国性的实验室间评估,旨在评估捷克共和国7个参考实验室对血浆中ctDNA进行EGFR检测的分析质量。
将13份血浆样本的等分试样送至7个实验室,样本包括市售的2ml基因组DNA血浆标本,其中最常见的敏感突变(外显子19缺失、L858R)和耐药突变T790M的突变等位基因频率分别为5%、0.5%、0.05%和0%。DNA提取和EGFR检测按照标准程序进行。7个实验室中有6个使用了cobas® EGFR突变检测试剂盒v2。1个实验室采用了Super-ARMS® EGFR突变检测试剂盒。
总共确定了91种基因型,总错误率为24.2%(22/91)。0.5%突变频率的总错误率为3.2%(2/63),5%突变频率的总错误率为0%(0/35)。未报告假阳性结果。cobas®方法对外显子19缺失的0.05%突变频率获得了一致的结果。对于L858R和T790M突变,阈值高于0.5%频率。
结果表明,血浆中ctDNA的EGFR检测灵敏度有限,尤其是对于T790M突变的检测。特别是,在对极低突变DNA血浆组分(低于0.01%)进行ctDNA检测时,应强调使用高灵敏度的分子方法。由于与组织检测相比假阴性率较高,这项质量评估的结果证实了血浆检测结果为阴性的患者需要再次活检。关键词:循环DNA - 液体活检 - 表皮生长因子受体 - 非小细胞肺癌 - 质量控制 本研究得到阿斯利康公司的资助以及卫生部项目编号00064203(Motol大学医院)的支持。作者声明他们在研究中使用的药物、产品或服务方面没有潜在的利益冲突。编辑委员会声明该手稿符合国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)对生物医学论文的建议。提交日期:2018年6月4日 接受日期:2018年8月1日