Aytaç Erman, Aslan Fatih, Çicek Bahattin, Erdamar Sibel, Gürses Bengi, Güven Koray, Falay Okan, Karahasanoğlu Tayfun, Selçukbiricik Fatih, Selek Uğur, Atalar Banu, Balık Emre, Tözün Nurdan, Rozanes İzzet, Arıcan Ali, Hamzaoğlu İsmail, Baca Bilgi, Molinas Mandel Nil, Saruç Murat, Göksel Süha, Demir Gökhan, Ağaoğlu Fulya, Yakıcıer Cengiz, Özbek Uğur, Özben Volkan, Özyar Enis, Güner Ahmet Levent, Er Özlem, Kaban Kerim, Bölükbaşı Yasemin, Buğra Dursun, Group The İstanbul
Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;30(7):584-598. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18737.
The geographical location and differences in tumor biology significantly change the management of gastric cancer. The prevalence of gastric cancer ranks fifth and sixth among men and women, respectively, in Turkey. The international guidelines from the Eastern and Western countries fail to manage a considerable amount of inconclusive issues in the management of gastric cancer. The uncertainties lead to significant heterogeneities in clinical practice, lack of homogeneous data collection, and subsequently, diverse outcomes. The physicians who are professionally involved in the management of gastric cancer at two institutions in Istanbul, Turkey, organized a consensus meeting to address current problems and plan feasible, logical, measurable, and collective solutions in their clinical practice for this challenging disease. The evidence-based data and current guidelines were reviewed. The gray zones in the management of gastric cancer were determined in the first session of this consensus meeting. The second session was constructed to discuss, vote, and ratify the ultimate decisions. The identification of the T stage, the esophagogastric area, imaging algorithm for proper staging and follow-up, timing and patient selection for neoadjuvant treatment, and management of advanced and metastatic disease have been accepted as the major issues in the management of gastric cancer. The recommendations are presented with the percentage of supporting votes in the results section with related data.
地理位置和肿瘤生物学差异显著改变了胃癌的治疗方式。在土耳其,胃癌的患病率在男性和女性中分别位列第五和第六。东西方国家的国际指南在胃癌治疗中未能解决大量尚无定论的问题。这些不确定性导致临床实践中存在显著的异质性,缺乏统一的数据收集,进而产生不同的治疗结果。土耳其伊斯坦布尔两家机构中专业从事胃癌治疗的医生组织了一次共识会议,以解决当前问题,并为这种具有挑战性的疾病在其临床实践中规划可行、合理、可衡量且统一的解决方案。对循证数据和现行指南进行了审查。在本次共识会议的第一阶段确定了胃癌治疗中的灰色地带。第二阶段则用于讨论、投票和批准最终决定。确定T分期、食管胃区域、合适分期及随访的影像算法、新辅助治疗的时机和患者选择,以及晚期和转移性疾病的治疗,已被视为胃癌治疗中的主要问题。结果部分将结合相关数据列出各项建议及其支持票数的百分比。