Baumann Oliver
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Interdisciplinary Centre for the Artificial Mind, School of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02374. eCollection 2018.
The effect of emotion on memory is powerful and complex. While there seems to be agreement that emotional arousal generally increases the likelihood that events are remembered, it is somewhat disputed whether also the valence of emotions influences memory. Specifically, several experiments by Kensinger and colleagues have provided evidence for the hypotheses that negative valanced emotions facilitate the encoding of perceptual details. On the other hand, Mather and colleagues have suggested that these results could be explained by confounding relationships of valence and arousal, i.e., that items that generate negative emotions are typically also more arousing. In this study, we provide a conceptual replication of Kensinger's findings. We employed a novel experimental design, in which the effects of standardized emotional arousing sounds on recognition accuracy for neutral visual scenes was measured. We indirectly manipulated the amount of visual detail that was encoded, by requiring participants to memorize either single exemplars (low interference) or multiple exemplars (high interference) of visual scene categories. With increasing visual overlap in the high interference condition, participants were required to encode a high degree of visual detail to successfully remember the exemplars. The results obtained from 60 healthy human participants confirmed Kensinger's hypothesis by showing that under conditions of high visual interference, negative valanced emotions led to higher levels of recognition accuracy compared to neutral and positive emotions. Furthermore, based on the normative arousal ratings of the stimulus set, our results suggest that the differential recognition effect cannot be explained by differing levels of arousal.
情绪对记忆的影响强大而复杂。虽然人们似乎普遍认同情绪唤起通常会增加事件被记住的可能性,但情绪的效价是否也会影响记忆仍存在一定争议。具体而言,肯辛格及其同事进行的多项实验为负面效价情绪促进感知细节编码的假设提供了证据。另一方面,马瑟及其同事认为,这些结果可能是由效价与唤起之间的混淆关系所解释的,即产生负面情绪的项目通常也更具唤起性。在本研究中,我们对肯辛格的研究结果进行了概念性复制。我们采用了一种新颖的实验设计,测量标准化情绪唤起声音对中性视觉场景识别准确性的影响。我们通过要求参与者记忆视觉场景类别的单个示例(低干扰)或多个示例(高干扰),间接操纵了编码的视觉细节量。在高干扰条件下,随着视觉重叠的增加,参与者需要编码高度的视觉细节才能成功记住这些示例。从60名健康人类参与者获得的结果证实了肯辛格的假设,即与中性和正面情绪相比,在高视觉干扰条件下,负面效价情绪导致更高水平的识别准确性。此外,基于刺激集的标准化唤起评分,我们的结果表明,差异识别效应不能用不同的唤起水平来解释。