Mavandadi Shahrzad, Wray Laura O, Toseland Ronald W
a VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) , CPL Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
b Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2019 Apr;62(3):324-337. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1556767. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
This study examined the psychometric properties of the Self-Appraisal of Change Scale, a measure designed to capture domains that are subjectively relevant to caregivers, associated with overall well-being, and amenable to change upon engaging in an intervention. Data from 107 caregivers of veterans with dementia enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered caregiver psychoeducation and support group program (the Telehealth Education Program (TEP)) were analyzed. The TEP, which was delivered by master's prepared social workers and a nurse dementia care manager, targeted caregivers' dementia-related knowledge, attitudes, and self-management skills. Analyses were conducted to determine the factor structure, reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the scale. Factor analyses yielded a single-factor solution for the scale's nine items. The reliability and construct validity of the scale were also supported by the analyses. Multi-group analyses suggested that meaningful comparisons of scale items and total raw scores can be made across usual care (UC) and intervention groups. The findings offer preliminary support that the scale may represent a valid and reliable instrument that captures perceived changes in key domains (e.g. caregiving knowledge, attitudes, and skill) following participation in a psychoeducational and support intervention trial.
本研究考察了变化自我评估量表的心理测量特性,该量表旨在获取与照料者主观相关、与总体幸福感相关且在参与干预后可发生变化的领域。对107名痴呆退伍军人照料者的数据进行了分析,这些照料者参加了一项通过电话提供照料者心理教育和支持小组项目(远程医疗教育项目(TEP))的随机对照试验。TEP由具备硕士学位的社会工作者和一名痴呆护理护士经理提供,目标是照料者与痴呆相关的知识、态度和自我管理技能。进行了分析以确定该量表的因子结构、信度、效度和测量不变性。因子分析得出该量表九个条目的单因子解。分析还支持了该量表的信度和结构效度。多组分析表明,可以在常规护理(UC)组和干预组之间对量表条目和原始总分进行有意义的比较。研究结果提供了初步支持,表明该量表可能是一种有效且可靠的工具,能够捕捉参与心理教育和支持干预试验后关键领域(如照料知识、态度和技能)的感知变化。