Suppr超能文献

评估电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒作为梅毒实验室筛查试验的效果。

Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis Assay as a Laboratory Screening Test for Syphilis.

作者信息

Li Xiaoqiong, Li Si, Huang Xianzhang, Huang Hui, He Min, Ke Peifeng, Huang Wujiao

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2018 Oct 31;64(11). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180301.

Abstract

The sexually transmitted infection (STI) syphilis remains a public health problem globally. The serological detection of specific antibodies to Treponema pallidum is particularly important in the diagnosis of syphilis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the newly developed Elecsys Syphilis assay and compare it with the local market well-established ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay.
A total of 1,097 clinical serum samples were obtained from routine diagnostic requests. All the serum or plasma samples were tested in parallel by Elecsys Syphilis assay and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement assay were verified. The inconsistent samples confirmed with a recombinant immunoblot assay as gold standard test.
The diagnostic performances of the two assays were very similar: both Elecsys Syphilis and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay performed with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 85.7 to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 85.7 to 100%), whereas the specificity was 99.90% (95% CI, 99.5 to 99.90%) and 99.49% (95% CI, 99.0 to 99.6%), respectively. The consistency in positive results between Elecsys and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay was 79.3%. The consistency in negative results between Elecsys and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay was 99.7%. The overall consistency between Elecsys and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay was 99.1%.
The Elecsys Syphilis assay can demonstrate excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and correlate well with ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay. It is a reliable and appropriate assay for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory.

摘要

性传播感染(STI)梅毒仍是全球范围内的一个公共卫生问题。梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体的血清学检测在梅毒诊断中尤为重要。本研究旨在评估新开发的电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒(Elecsys Syphilis assay),并将其与当地市场上成熟的Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白(ARCHITECT Syphilis TP assay)检测方法进行比较。

共从常规诊断请求中获取了1097份临床血清样本。所有血清或血浆样本均同时采用电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒和Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法进行检测。对灵敏度、特异性和一致性检测进行了验证。以重组免疫印迹法作为金标准检测方法对结果不一致的样本进行确认。

两种检测方法的诊断性能非常相似

电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒和Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法的灵敏度均为100%(95%置信区间,85.7%至100%),而特异性分别为99.90%(95%置信区间,99.5%至99.90%)和99.49%(95%置信区间,99.0%至99.6%)。电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒和Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法阳性结果的一致性为79.3%。电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒和Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法阴性结果的一致性为99.7%。电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒和Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法的总体一致性为99.1%。

电化学发光免疫分析法检测梅毒具有出色的诊断灵敏度和特异性,与Architect梅毒螺旋体蛋白检测法相关性良好。它是诊断实验室常规使用的一种可靠且合适的检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验