Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:861-868. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
Well-validated screening tools have been developed to identify people at high risk for psychosis, but these are rarely used outside of specialty clinics or research settings. The development of extremely brief and simple screening tools could increase dissemination, especially in settings with low buy-in such as those with low base rates of psychosis and/or time constraints. We sought to identify such a brief measure by modeling participant responses to three psychosis screening questionnaires (Prime Screen; Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief; Youth Psychosis At Risk Questionnaire) in a sample of 139 help-seeking individuals and 335 college students (age range: 12-25). Two screening questions with especially strong information characteristics were identified: "Do you see things that others can't or don't see?" and "Have you ever felt that someone was playing with your mind?" (Alternative two-item screens with similarly strong properties were also identified and validated using uncertainty quantified through Bayesian modeling.) The resulting measure was validated against clinician ratings of psychosis. The screen performed with a sensitivity of 53% and specificity 98% for clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, and sensitivity of 32% and specificity 99% for identifying people in an early phase of psychosis (clinical high risk or first episode psychosis).
已经开发出了经过良好验证的筛选工具,以识别有患精神病高风险的人群,但这些工具很少在专业诊所或研究环境之外使用。开发极其简短和简单的筛选工具可以增加传播,特别是在那些精神病基础率低和/或时间限制的情况下。我们通过对 139 名寻求帮助的个体和 335 名大学生(年龄范围:12-25 岁)的三个精神病筛选问卷(Prime Screen;前驱期问卷-简短版;青年精神病高危问卷)的参与者回答进行建模,试图找到这样一个简短的衡量标准。两个具有特别强信息特征的筛选问题被确定:“你是否看到别人看不到或看不到的东西?”和“你是否曾经觉得有人在玩弄你的心思?”(也确定并验证了具有类似强属性的替代两项屏幕,并通过贝叶斯建模进行了不确定性量化。)该测量方法针对精神病临床医生的评分进行了验证。该筛选对临床显著的幻觉或妄想的敏感性为 53%,特异性为 98%,对处于精神病早期阶段(临床高风险或首发精神病)的人的敏感性为 32%,特异性为 99%。