Suppr超能文献

两项条目早期精神病筛查的有效性。

Validity of a two-item screen for early psychosis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:861-868. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

Abstract

Well-validated screening tools have been developed to identify people at high risk for psychosis, but these are rarely used outside of specialty clinics or research settings. The development of extremely brief and simple screening tools could increase dissemination, especially in settings with low buy-in such as those with low base rates of psychosis and/or time constraints. We sought to identify such a brief measure by modeling participant responses to three psychosis screening questionnaires (Prime Screen; Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief; Youth Psychosis At Risk Questionnaire) in a sample of 139 help-seeking individuals and 335 college students (age range: 12-25). Two screening questions with especially strong information characteristics were identified: "Do you see things that others can't or don't see?" and "Have you ever felt that someone was playing with your mind?" (Alternative two-item screens with similarly strong properties were also identified and validated using uncertainty quantified through Bayesian modeling.) The resulting measure was validated against clinician ratings of psychosis. The screen performed with a sensitivity of 53% and specificity 98% for clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, and sensitivity of 32% and specificity 99% for identifying people in an early phase of psychosis (clinical high risk or first episode psychosis).

摘要

已经开发出了经过良好验证的筛选工具,以识别有患精神病高风险的人群,但这些工具很少在专业诊所或研究环境之外使用。开发极其简短和简单的筛选工具可以增加传播,特别是在那些精神病基础率低和/或时间限制的情况下。我们通过对 139 名寻求帮助的个体和 335 名大学生(年龄范围:12-25 岁)的三个精神病筛选问卷(Prime Screen;前驱期问卷-简短版;青年精神病高危问卷)的参与者回答进行建模,试图找到这样一个简短的衡量标准。两个具有特别强信息特征的筛选问题被确定:“你是否看到别人看不到或看不到的东西?”和“你是否曾经觉得有人在玩弄你的心思?”(也确定并验证了具有类似强属性的替代两项屏幕,并通过贝叶斯建模进行了不确定性量化。)该测量方法针对精神病临床医生的评分进行了验证。该筛选对临床显著的幻觉或妄想的敏感性为 53%,特异性为 98%,对处于精神病早期阶段(临床高风险或首发精神病)的人的敏感性为 32%,特异性为 99%。

相似文献

1
Validity of a two-item screen for early psychosis.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:861-868. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
2
Using the K-SADS psychosis screen to identify people with early psychosis or psychosis risk syndromes.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;24(4):809-820. doi: 10.1177/1359104519846582. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Identifying youth at risk for psychosis using the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition.
Schizophr Res. 2013 Dec;151(1-3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
4
Psychometric Properties of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version among Chinese Help-Seeking Individuals.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148935. eCollection 2016.
5
Psychosis risk screening in youth: a validation study of three self-report measures of attenuated psychosis symptoms.
Schizophr Res. 2012 Oct;141(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
6
Longitudinal validation of psychosis risk screening tools.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Jul;165(2-3):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
Does dissociation mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and hallucinations, delusions in first episode psychosis?
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;84:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
8
Self-Report Instruments for Clinical Monitoring of Psychosis Risk States.
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Apr 1;67(4):456-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500063. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
What is the relative importance of self reported psychotic symptoms in epidemiological studies? Results from the ESEMeD--Catalonia Study.
Schizophr Res. 2008 Jul;102(1-3):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 May 20.
10
What's the risk? The frequency of false positives in psychosis risk screening instruments.
Psychol Serv. 2021 May;18(2):137-146. doi: 10.1037/ser0000363. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

3
Nurture-U student mental health longitudinal survey: a study protocol.
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 11;15(2):e098413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098413.
6
Youth Mental Health Screening and Linkage to Care.
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jul 1;74(7):727-736. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200008. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
7
Psychotic-like experiences in childhood and early adolescence: Clarifying the construct and future directions.
Schizophr Res. 2022 Aug;246:205-206. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
10
Patient and Provider Insights into the Impact of Multiple Sclerosis on Mental Health: A Narrative Review.
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):99-119. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00240-9. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptability of Psychosis Screening and Factors Affecting Its Implementation: Interviews With Community Health Care Providers.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jun 1;69(6):689-695. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700392. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Considerations for the development and implementation of brief screening tools in the identification of early psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
3
Perceived social stress and symptom severity among help-seeking adolescents with versus without clinical high-risk for psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
6
Psychosis-like experiences and distress among adolescents using mental health services.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Feb;152(2-3):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
Psychosis risk screening in youth: a validation study of three self-report measures of attenuated psychosis symptoms.
Schizophr Res. 2012 Oct;141(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
9
Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B).
Schizophr Res. 2011 Jun;129(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验