Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Spire Sciences, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):413-420. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213336. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
To assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anti-interleukin (IL)-1α/β dual variable domain immunoglobulin lutikizumab (ABT-981) in erosive hand osteoarthritis (HOA).
Patients with ≥1 erosive and ≥3 tender and/or swollen hand joints were randomised to placebo or lutikizumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain subdomain score from baseline to 16 weeks. At baseline and week 26, subjects had bilateral hand radiographs and MRI of the hand with the greatest number of baseline tender and/or swollen joints. Continuous endpoints were assessed using analysis of covariance models, with treatment and country as main factors and baseline measurements as covariates.
Of 132 randomised subjects, 1 received no study drug and 110 completed the study (placebo, 61/67 (91%); lutikizumab, 49/64 (77%)). AUSCAN pain was not different among subjects treated with lutikizumab versus placebo at week 16 (least squares mean difference, 1.5 (95% CI -1.9 to 5.0)). Other clinical and imaging endpoints were not different between lutikizumab and placebo. Lutikizumab significantly decreased serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein levels, IL-1α and IL-1β levels, and blood neutrophils. Lutikizumab pharmacokinetics were consistent with phase I studies and not affected by antidrug antibodies. Injection site reactions and neutropaenia were more common in the lutikizumab group; discontinuations because of adverse events occurred more frequently with lutikizumab (4/64) versus placebo (1/67).
Despite adequate blockade of IL-1, lutikizumab did not improve pain or imaging outcomes in erosive HOA compared with placebo.
评估抗白细胞介素(IL)-1α/β双可变结构域免疫球蛋白 lutikizumab(ABT-981)在侵蚀性手骨关节炎(HOA)中的疗效、安全性、药代动力学和药效学。
至少有 1 个侵蚀性和≥3 个压痛和/或肿胀的手部关节的患者被随机分配至安慰剂或 lutikizumab 200mg 皮下注射,每 2 周 1 次,共 24 周。主要终点为从基线到 16 周时澳大利亚/加拿大骨关节炎手部指数(AUSCAN)疼痛子域评分的变化。在基线和第 26 周,受试者进行双侧手部 X 线摄影和手部最大数量的基线压痛和/或肿胀关节的 MRI。使用协方差分析模型评估连续终点,治疗和国家为主要因素,基线测量值为协变量。
在 132 名随机受试者中,1 名受试者未接受研究药物,110 名受试者完成了研究(安慰剂组 61/67(91%);lutikizumab 组 49/64(77%))。与安慰剂相比,接受 lutikizumab 治疗的受试者在第 16 周时 AUSCAN 疼痛没有差异(最小二乘均值差异,1.5(95%CI-1.9 至 5.0))。其他临床和影像学终点在 lutikizumab 和安慰剂之间没有差异。lutikizumab 显著降低了血清高敏 C 反应蛋白水平、IL-1α 和 IL-1β 水平以及血液中性粒细胞计数。lutikizumab 的药代动力学与 I 期研究一致,不受抗药抗体的影响。与 lutikizumab 组相比,注射部位反应和中性粒细胞减少更为常见;由于不良事件而停药的情况在 lutikizumab 组更为常见(4/64),安慰剂组为 1/67。
尽管充分阻断了 IL-1,但与安慰剂相比,lutikizumab 并未改善侵蚀性 HOA 的疼痛或影像学结局。