• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性美国研究性器械豁免试验:一种无缝线主动脉生物瓣:一年结果。

Prospective US investigational device exemption trial of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: One-year outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi and Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi and Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1773-1782.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.121. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.121
PMID:30553598
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We performed a prospective, single-arm clinical trial approved under a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption to assess safety and efficacy of Perceval, a sutureless bovine pericardial aortic valve representing the initial US experience.

METHODS

From June 2013 to January 2015, 300 patients (mean age 76.7 ± 7.7 years, 54.3% men, 37.3% ≥80 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality 2.8%), underwent Perceval valve implantation at 18 centers across the United States. Twenty patients (6.7%) had a bicuspid aortic valve and 5 (1.7%) patients had previous aortic valve replacement. A minimally invasive approach was used in 80 (26.7%) and concomitant procedures were performed in 113 (37.8%) patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-nine patients (96.3%) were successfully implanted. Operative mortality (≤30 days) was 1.3% (n = 4) (observed to expected ratio of 0.40). One-year results included all-cause mortality in 5.2% (n = 15), stroke in 1% (n = 3), and endocarditis in 1.7% (n = 5). New permanent periprocedural pacemaker rate was 10.7% (n = 30/281); 2.5% (n = 7/281) resulted from third-degree atrioventricular block. One-year valve-related reoperation was 2.1% (n = 6). At 1-year follow-up, 98% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I/II, left ventricular mass index decreased from 103.5 ± 30.1 g/m at discharge to 95.8 ± 27.1 g/m (P = .001), and 3 (1.3%) moderate paravalvular leaks were identified. Health-related quality of life score increased from 62.7 ± 21.8 before surgery to 85.5 ± 17.8 at 1 year (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement in study patients with lower mortality than expected from a risk prediction model. Persistent hemodynamic benefit and improvement in quality of life at 1 year support the importance of this device in the management of aortic valve disease.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项前瞻性、单臂临床试验,该试验获得了美国食品和药物管理局的研究性器械豁免批准,以评估 Perceval 缝线生物瓣的安全性和疗效,这是在美国的首次应用。

方法

从 2013 年 6 月至 2015 年 1 月,在美国 18 个中心,共有 300 名患者(平均年龄 76.7±7.7 岁,54.3%为男性,37.3%≥80 岁,中位胸外科医师学会预测死亡率为 2.8%)接受了 Perceval 瓣膜植入术。20 名患者(6.7%)为二叶式主动脉瓣,5 名患者(1.7%)曾接受过主动脉瓣置换术。80 名患者(26.7%)采用微创入路,113 名患者(37.8%)同时进行了其他手术。

结果

289 名患者(96.3%)成功植入。手术死亡率(30 天内)为 1.3%(n=4)(观察到的与预期的比值为 0.40)。1 年结果包括全因死亡率为 5.2%(n=15),卒中 1%(n=3),感染性心内膜炎 1.7%(n=5)。新的永久性围手术期起搏器使用率为 10.7%(n=30/281);2.5%(n=7/281)因三度房室传导阻滞而使用。1 年时瓣膜相关再次手术率为 2.1%(n=6)。1 年随访时,98%的患者心功能纽约分级为Ⅰ/Ⅱ级,左心室质量指数从出院时的 103.5±30.1g/m 降至 95.8±27.1g/m(P=0.001),3 例(1.3%)存在中度瓣周漏。健康相关生活质量评分从术前的 62.7±21.8 提高到 1 年时的 85.5±17.8(P<0.001)。

结论

这些结果证实了 Perceval 无缝线主动脉瓣置换术在研究患者中的安全性和有效性,其死亡率低于风险预测模型的预期。1 年时持续的血液动力学获益和生活质量的改善支持该器械在主动脉瓣疾病管理中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Prospective US investigational device exemption trial of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: One-year outcomes.前瞻性美国研究性器械豁免试验:一种无缝线主动脉生物瓣:一年结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1773-1782.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.121. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
2
Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与传统主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的临床研究进展
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):e006091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006091.
3
Intermediate-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue.使用新型组织生物瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换的中期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1478-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.095. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄:无缝合 versus 传统生物瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):920-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Outcome of a Modified Perceval Implantation Technique.改良佩尔塞瓦尔植入技术的结果
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68(7):602-607. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685512. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
A Meta-Analysis of Sutureless or Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement.无缝合或快速植入主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(5):400-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566130. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation and bicuspid valve anatomy: an unsolved dilemma?无缝合主动脉生物瓣膜植入与二叶式瓣膜解剖结构:一个尚未解决的难题?
Heart Vessels. 2016 Nov;31(11):1783-1789. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0790-x. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.主动脉瓣置换术的无缝合与带支架生物瓣膜:随机PERSIST-AVR研究设计
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;68(2):114-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Sutureless Valve Replacement Through a Right Anterior Mini-thoracotomy in Elderly Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve.经右前小切口行非体外循环下主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(3):458-464. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
10
Sutureless and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: When Rivals Become Allies.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的无缝合技术:当竞争对手成为盟友。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(3):427-430. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Use-Rates of and Scientific Evidence on Sutureless Devices in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Bibliographic Meta-Analysis and Clinical Considerations.探索主动脉瓣置换术中无缝合装置的使用率及科学证据:一项文献计量学荟萃分析与临床考量
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4049. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124049.
2
Early and Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Sutureless vs. Sutured Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement.无缝合生物瓣膜与缝合生物瓣膜用于主动脉瓣置换的早期及长期临床和超声心动图结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 May 22;10(5):224. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10050224.
3
Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.
主动脉瓣快速置换术:患者选择与特殊注意事项。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023 Mar 29;19:169-180. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S374410. eCollection 2023.
4
Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant.近期手术技术的改进使得 Perceval 植入术后的起搏器植入率降低。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul 9;35(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac182.
5
A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入起搏器的 pooled 分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Oct 4;33(4):501-509. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab137.
6
A case of challenging percutaneous coronary intervention following surgical aortic valve replacement with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis.一例在接受无缝合主动脉生物瓣膜置换术后进行具有挑战性的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的病例。
J Cardiol Cases. 2020 Jul 30;22(4):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2020.06.018. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch.采用Perceval或Trifecta预防患者-假体不匹配。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):2964. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092964.