Anthony Nolan Research Institute, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QU, United Kingdom.
Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 14;37(3):452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.061. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
Traditionally, immune response to influenza vaccines has been measured using the haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. A broader repertoire of techniques including the sensitive viral microneutralization (VMN) assay is now recommended by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Comparing HAI and VMN, we determined immune response to a trivalent 2015-2016 seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (SIIV) administered to 28 recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Vaccination was within the first-year post-transplant at a median of 78.5 (24-363) days. The proportion of patients with baseline and post-vaccination HAI titres ≥ 1:40 were 28.6% and 25% for A(H1N1)pdm09, 14.3% at both timepoints for A(H3N2), and 32.1% and 25% for B(Phuket). Pre and Post-vaccination geometric mean titres(GMT) were higher by VMN than HAI for A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), but lower for B(Phuket)(p=<0.05). Geometric mean ratios(GMR) of baseline and post-vaccination titres were similar by HAI and VMN(p > 0.05) for all components. A single seroconversion to A(H1N1) was detected by ELISA-VMN. None of patient age, lymphocyte count, days from transplant to vaccination, donor type, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) at vaccination correlated with baseline or post-vaccination titres by either assay. This absence of seroresponse to SIIV in the first-year post HSCT highlights the need for novel immunogenic vaccination formulations and schedules in this high-risk population.
传统上,流感疫苗的免疫反应是通过血凝抑制 (HAI) 测定来测量的。现在,欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 推荐使用更广泛的技术,包括灵敏的病毒微量中和 (VMN) 测定。通过比较 HAI 和 VMN,我们确定了对 28 名异基因造血干细胞移植 (HSCT) 受者接种的 2015-2016 年三价季节性灭活流感疫苗 (SIIV) 的免疫反应。疫苗接种是在移植后第一年进行的,中位数为 78.5(24-363)天。基线和接种后 HAI 滴度≥1:40 的患者比例为 A(H1N1)pdm09 为 28.6%和 25%,A(H3N2)为 14.3%,B(Phuket)为 32.1%和 25%。与 HAI 相比,VMN 对 A(H1N1)pdm09 和 A(H3N2)的基础和接种后几何平均滴度 (GMT) 更高,但对 B(Phuket)则更低(p<0.05)。通过 HAI 和 VMN,基础和接种后滴度的几何平均比值 (GMR) 相似(p>0.05)。通过 ELISA-VMN 检测到对 A(H1N1)的单一血清转化。患者年龄、淋巴细胞计数、从移植到接种的天数、供体类型、或接种时的移植物抗宿主病 (GVHD) 或免疫抑制治疗 (IST) 均与两种测定法的基线或接种后滴度均无相关性。在 HSCT 后第一年,SIIV 未产生血清反应,这突出表明需要为这一高危人群提供新型免疫原性疫苗配方和接种方案。