Suppr超能文献

患者在接受结直肠癌筛查转诊后的需求。

Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

机构信息

VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.

School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan; Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient-physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support.

METHODS

Primary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016.

RESULTS

Findings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.

摘要

简介

医患之间关于结直肠癌筛查的沟通会影响筛查的使用,但讨论往往缺乏患者做出知情决策所需的信息,而且很少涉及个人偏好或障碍。为了解决这一差距,进行了一系列患者焦点小组讨论,以指导开发在线互动决策支持计划。本文介绍了在接受医生筛查建议后,患者对结直肠癌筛查的信息需求和障碍的调查结果,以及他们对将电子患者门户作为健康相关决策支持平台的看法。

方法

通过一家大型中西部医疗系统的集中式数据存储库,确定最近有结肠镜检查或粪便检测医嘱的初级保健患者。2016 年 4 月至 7 月期间,共召集了 7 个按性别分层的焦点小组(共 45 名参与者)。2016 年 8 月开始,对会议进行录音、转录、编码和分析,以找出共同表达的主题。

结果

研究结果显示,患者对结直肠癌筛查的信息存在持续的需求,需要简单明了的信息。参与者希望逐步了解结肠镜检查的过程,并了解肠道准备的选择/替代方案。所需的额外信息水平因人而异:一些患者希望了解并采取测试选项,而另一些患者则更愿意遵循医生推荐的测试路径。恐惧和担忧普遍存在,特别是对结肠镜检查,患者报告说在解决这些担忧和他们的信息需求方面存在挑战。最后,他们一致支持使用患者门户从医生那里获取更多信息。

结论

患者门户可能为与诊所工作流程和程序集成的决策支持和辅助的可持续计划提供机会。

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs.
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):148-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00430.x.
6
Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):673-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110001.
7
Increasing referral rate for screening colonoscopy through patient education and activation at a primary care clinic in New York City.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
Rethinking the Re-Prep: Attitudes Toward Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests After Inadequate Bowel Preparation.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;114(10):1685-1687. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000356.
9
Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817dc496.
10
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Burden Scale for Colonoscopy Experienced by Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2025 Feb 14;10(1):61-75. doi: 10.1159/000543686. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Advancing cancer care through digital access in the USA: a state-of-the-art review of patient portals in oncology.
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;4(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000432. eCollection 2025.
3
A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Dec 25;49:102954. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Healthcare experiences among Black and White sexual and gender minority cancer survivors: a qualitative study.
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun;19(3):779-788. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01504-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
New Patient Education Video on Colonoscopy Preparation: Development and Evaluation Study.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Oct 21;7(4):e15353. doi: 10.2196/15353.
10
Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):746-755. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

3
Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
4
Men's information-seeking behavior regarding cancer risk and screening: A meta-narrative systematic review.
Psychooncology. 2018 Feb;27(2):410-419. doi: 10.1002/pon.4506. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
5
Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e173-e177. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw095.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jun;25(6):907-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0990. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Colon cancer screening: tackling a multifaceted challenge.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 6;106(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju383. Print 2014 Dec.
10
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验