Peterson Emily B, Ostroff Jamie S, DuHamel Katherine N, D'Agostino Thomas A, Hernandez Marisol, Canzona Mollie R, Bylund Carma L
George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN 3D6, Fairfax, VA 22031, United States.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States.
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Cancer screening is critical for early detection and a lack of screening is associated with late-stage diagnosis and lower survival rates. The goal of this review was to analyze studies that focused on the role of provider-patient communication in screening behavior for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in four online databases between 1992 and 2016. Studies were included when the provider being studied was a primary care provider and the communication was face-to-face. The search resulted in 3252 records for review and 35 articles were included in the review. Studies were divided into three categories: studies comparing recommendation status to screening compliance; studies examining the relationship between communication quality and screening behavior; and intervention studies that used provider communication to improve screening behavior. There is overwhelming evidence that provider recommendation significantly improves screening rates. Studies examining quality of communication are heterogeneous in method, operationalization and results, but suggest giving information and shared decision making had a significant relationship with screening behavior. Intervention studies were similarly heterogeneous and showed positive results of communication interventions on screening behavior. Overall, results suggest that provider recommendation is necessary but not sufficient for optimal adherence to cancer screening guidelines. Quality studies suggest that provider-patient communication is more nuanced than just a simple recommendation. Discussions surrounding the recommendation may have an important bearing on a person's decision to get screened. Research needs to move beyond studies examining recommendations and adherence and focus more on the relationship between communication quality and screening adherence.
癌症筛查对于早期发现至关重要,缺乏筛查与晚期诊断及较低生存率相关。本综述的目的是分析聚焦于医患沟通在宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查行为中作用的研究。1992年至2016年间在四个在线数据库中进行了全面检索。当所研究的医疗服务提供者为初级保健提供者且沟通为面对面时,研究被纳入。检索结果有3252条记录供审查,35篇文章被纳入综述。研究分为三类:比较推荐状态与筛查依从性的研究;考察沟通质量与筛查行为之间关系的研究;以及使用医疗服务提供者沟通来改善筛查行为的干预研究。有压倒性的证据表明,医疗服务提供者的推荐能显著提高筛查率。考察沟通质量的研究在方法、操作化和结果方面存在异质性,但表明提供信息和共同决策与筛查行为有显著关系。干预研究同样存在异质性,并显示出沟通干预对筛查行为有积极效果。总体而言,结果表明医疗服务提供者的推荐对于最佳遵循癌症筛查指南是必要的,但并不充分。高质量研究表明,医患沟通比简单的推荐更为细致入微。围绕推荐的讨论可能对一个人进行筛查的决定有重要影响。研究需要超越考察推荐和依从性的研究,更多地关注沟通质量与筛查依从性之间的关系。