• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合医院对乳腺癌患者进行辅助化疗的情况。意大利癌症护理评估跨学科小组(G.I.V.I.O.)

Performance of general hospitals in delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to breast cancer patients. G.I.V.I.O. (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation), Italy.

出版信息

Tumori. 1988 Aug 31;74(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/030089168807400402.

DOI:10.1177/030089168807400402
PMID:3055576
Abstract

Indications for and modes of delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer were assessed in a group of 353 patients followed within a cohort of 1110 newly diagnosed cases in 54 Italian general hospitals. Among node-positive patients 79% pre- and 44% post-menopausal women had the treatment. Only a few node-negative women (10% pre- and 5% post-menopausal) were treated. The multidrug combination CMF was by far the most commonly employed (89%) in its two types: cCMF (the classic combination where cyclophosphamide is given orally on days 1-14 and the two other drugs i.v. on days 1 and 8 every 28 days for either 6 or 12 cycles) to 33% women and nCMF (the more recent combination where all three drugs are given i.v. on day 1 every 21 days for 12 cycles) to 63%. The mode of delivery of treatment was consistent with the Italian National Breast Cancer Task Force (F.O.N.Ca.M.) recommendations for the cCMF combination, but the lack of clear guidelines on the use of nCMF led to wide variations in the total number of cycles administered. At present, however, it is hard to establish whether this will have any impact on patients' outcome. Overall the study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has entered general practice and can be satisfactorily delivered at the community level. However, better guidelines need to specify more precisely the treatment indications (i.e. subgroups with greater expected benefits), regimen type (is nCMF still experimental or already standard?) and treatment duration, in view of the present uncertainty about what should be the standard for general practice. The paper finally discusses the feasibility of the treatment comparing general hospitals' performance with that achieved in controlled clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy.

摘要

在意大利54家综合医院的1110例新诊断乳腺癌病例队列中,对353例患者进行了随访,评估早期乳腺癌辅助化疗的适应证和给药方式。在淋巴结阳性患者中,79%的绝经前和44%的绝经后女性接受了治疗。只有少数淋巴结阴性女性(绝经前10%,绝经后5%)接受了治疗。多药联合方案CMF是目前使用最为广泛的(89%),包括两种类型:经典CMF方案(cCMF),即环磷酰胺在第1 - 14天口服,另外两种药物在第1天和第8天静脉注射,每28天重复一次,共6或12个周期,占33%;新CMF方案(nCMF),即三种药物均在第1天静脉注射,每21天重复一次,共12个周期,占63%。cCMF方案的给药方式符合意大利国家乳腺癌特别工作组(F.O.N.Ca.M.)的建议,但由于缺乏nCMF方案的明确指南,导致给药总周期数差异很大。然而,目前很难确定这是否会对患者的治疗结果产生影响。总体而言,该研究表明乳腺癌辅助化疗已进入常规医疗实践,并且在社区层面可以得到满意的实施。然而,鉴于目前对于常规医疗实践的标准尚不明确,需要更好的指南更精确地明确治疗适应证(即预期获益更大的亚组)、方案类型(nCMF方案仍属于试验性还是已成为标准方案?)和治疗持续时间。本文最后比较了综合医院与辅助化疗对照临床试验的实施情况,讨论了该治疗方案的可行性。

相似文献

1
Performance of general hospitals in delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to breast cancer patients. G.I.V.I.O. (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation), Italy.综合医院对乳腺癌患者进行辅助化疗的情况。意大利癌症护理评估跨学科小组(G.I.V.I.O.)
Tumori. 1988 Aug 31;74(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/030089168807400402.
2
Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.多柔比星联合氟尿嘧啶和环磷酰胺(静脉注射FAC方案,第1天、第21天)与甲氨蝶呤联合氟尿嘧啶和环磷酰胺(静脉注射CMF方案,第1天、第21天)作为可手术乳腺癌辅助化疗的比较:GEICAM组的一项研究
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):833-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260.
3
Comparison of adjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate and fluorouracil with and without cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes.在有1至3个腋窝淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者中,比较甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶联合或不联合环磷酰胺的辅助化疗效果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 May 19;85(10):812-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.10.812.
4
Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF.乳腺癌辅助化疗的疗程:两项关于CMF方案三疗程与六疗程对比的随机试验的联合分析
Br J Cancer. 2002 Jun 5;86(11):1705-14. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600334.
5
Lack of effectiveness of adjuvant alternating chemotherapy in node-positive, estrogen-receptor-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients: results of a multicentric Italian study. The Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo-Hormone Therapy Cooperative Group (GROCTA).
Cancer Invest. 1997;15(6):505-12. doi: 10.3109/07357909709047591.
6
Adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil--11-year results of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research trial SAKK 27/82.可手术乳腺癌的辅助化疗:环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶与苯丁酸氮芥、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶的对比——瑞士临床癌症研究组SAKK 27/82试验的11年结果
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2502-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2502.
7
Sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil for the treatment of node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors: eight-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-13 and first report of findings from NSABP B-19 comparing methotrexate and fluorouracil with conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.序贯使用甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶治疗雌激素受体阴性的淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者:国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)B - 13的八年结果以及NSABP B - 19比较甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶与传统环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶的研究结果首次报告
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jul;14(7):1982-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.7.1982.
8
Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration.环磷酰胺、阿霉素、氟尿嘧啶和长春新碱与环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶用于淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗的对比:中位随访16年后的最终报告
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1136-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1136.
9
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.环磷酰胺、表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶强化化疗与环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶治疗绝经前淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的随机试验。加拿大国家癌症研究所临床试验组
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2651-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2651.
10
The feasibility of classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for pre- and post-menopausal node-positive breast cancer patients in a Belgian multicentric trial: a study of consistency in relative dose intensity (RDI) and cumulative doses across institutions.在一项比利时多中心试验中,经典环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)方案用于绝经前和绝经后淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的可行性:一项关于各机构相对剂量强度(RDI)和累积剂量一致性的研究。
Ann Oncol. 2002 Mar;13(3):416-21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf051.