• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PM 的潜在来源:通过对浆液液滴干燥和破裂的模拟来分析湿法烟气脱硫系统中细颗粒生成的机理。

A potential source for PM: Analysis of fine particle generation mechanism in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System by modeling drying and breakage of slurry droplet.

机构信息

School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.

School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction for Metallurgical Industry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2019 Mar;246:249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.001
PMID:30557798
Abstract

Aerosol particulate matter with dynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM) is the main cause for haze pollution in China. As a dominant precursor of PM, SO emitted from industrial process is now strictly controlled by using limestone/gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) system in China. However, a phenomenon that fine particle derived from WFGD is recently addressed, and is suggested to be a potential source of primary PM. Herein, a first investigation into the particle generation mechanism in WFGD system is conducted with a novel droplet (containing particles) drying and breakage model. The proposed model considers a random and porous crust instead of the previous regular crust assumption, and is verified by comparing the modeling results with measurements. An orthogonal test with four factors and three levels is carried out through modeling calculation, and flue gas temperature (T) in the inlet is found to be a governing parameter for PM yields in WFGD. With T in range of 120-160 °C, PM yields in desulfurizing tower can reach a maximum value at ∼2 × 10 cm under typical WFGD condition. To avoid this situation and reduce the PM generation, T is suggested to be lower than 120 °C. Additionally, a new insight of the elimination effect of gas-gas heater (GGH) on "gypsum rain" in WFGD system is provided.

摘要

在中国,直径小于 2.5μm 的气溶胶颗粒物(PM)是雾霾污染的主要原因。作为 PM 的主要前体物,工业过程中排放的 SO 通过在中国使用石灰石/石膏湿法烟气脱硫(WFGD)系统得到了严格的控制。然而,最近人们关注到一个现象,即来自 WFGD 的细颗粒可能是初级 PM 的潜在来源。在此,通过建立一种新的液滴(包含颗粒)干燥和破裂模型,对 WFGD 系统中的颗粒生成机制进行了首次研究。所提出的模型考虑了随机多孔外壳,而不是之前的规则外壳假设,并通过将建模结果与测量结果进行比较进行了验证。通过建模计算进行了一个四因素三水平的正交试验,发现进入脱硫塔的烟气温度(T)是 WFGD 中 PM 产率的控制参数。在 120-160°C 的范围内,在典型的 WFGD 条件下,脱硫塔中的 PM 产率在 2×10cm 时达到最大值。为了避免这种情况并减少 PM 的生成,建议 T 低于 120°C。此外,还提供了对 WFGD 系统中气体-气体加热器(GGH)对“石膏雨”消除效果的新认识。

相似文献

1
A potential source for PM: Analysis of fine particle generation mechanism in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System by modeling drying and breakage of slurry droplet.PM 的潜在来源:通过对浆液液滴干燥和破裂的模拟来分析湿法烟气脱硫系统中细颗粒生成的机理。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Mar;246:249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
2
Improving the removal of fine particles by chemical agglomeration during the limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization process.通过石灰石-石膏湿法烟气脱硫过程中的化学团聚作用提高细微颗粒的去除率。
J Environ Sci (China). 2019 Jun;80:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
3
Transformation and removal of ammonium sulfate aerosols and ammonia slip from selective catalytic reduction in wet flue gas desulfurization system.湿式烟气脱硫系统中选择性催化还原过程中硫酸铵气溶胶的转化与去除及氨逃逸。
J Environ Sci (China). 2020 Feb;88:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Measurement of slurry droplets in coal-fired flue gas after WFGD.湿法烟气脱硫后燃煤烟气中浆液滴的测量。
Environ Geochem Health. 2015 Oct;37(5):915-29. doi: 10.1007/s10653-014-9648-x. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
5
Effect of wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) on fine particle (PM) emission from coal-fired boilers.湿烟气脱硫(WFGD)对燃煤锅炉细颗粒物(PM)排放的影响。
J Environ Sci (China). 2019 Mar;77:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Investigation on the relationship between the fine particle emission and crystallization characteristics of gypsum during wet flue gas desulfurization process.湿法烟气脱硫过程中石膏细颗粒排放与结晶特性之间关系的研究
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 May;55:303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Migration and distribution characteristics of typical organic pollutants in condensable particulate matter of coal-fired flue gas and by-products of wet flue gas desulfurization system.燃煤烟气可凝结颗粒物及湿法烟气脱硫系统副产物中典型有机污染物的迁移与分布特征。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(17):26170-26181. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32923-9. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Effects of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization and Wet Electrostatic Precipitators on Emission Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Its Ionic Compositions from Four 300 MW Level Ultralow Coal-Fired Power Plants.湿烟气脱硫和湿式静电除尘器对四个 300MW 级超净燃煤电厂颗粒物排放特性及其离子成分的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 4;52(23):14015-14026. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03656. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Modeling and optimization of wet flue gas desulfurization system based on a hybrid modeling method.基于混合建模方法的湿法烟气脱硫系统建模与优化。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):565-575. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1551252. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Characteristics of particulate matter from four coal-fired power plants with low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator in China.中国四家采用低低温静电除尘器的燃煤电厂的颗粒物特性。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.080. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Fine Particle Removal Using a Single-Channel Slit Bubbling Device in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System.在湿法烟气脱硫系统中使用单通道狭缝鼓泡装置提高细颗粒物去除率
ACS Omega. 2024 Feb 14;9(8):9321-9330. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08250. eCollection 2024 Feb 27.
2
Air Pollution Impairs Subjective Happiness by Damaging Their Health.空气污染通过损害健康来降低人们的主观幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910319.