Liao Xiaoli, Li Hualan, Liu Zhihui, Liao Sina, Li Qian, Liang Chaoyong, Huang Yu, Xie Mingzhi, Wei Junbao, Li Yongqiang
Department of First Chemotherapy.
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(50):e13635. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013635.
There is currently no standard therapeutic regimen available for patients with advanced colorectal cancer in whom the disease continues to progress after 2 or more lines of chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for whom at least two lines of prior chemotherapy had failed.Twenty seven patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed at least 2 lines chemotherapy were treated with apatinib (500 mg/day). As a comparison control, 26 advanced colorectal cancer patients with comparable clinical baseline characteristics including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, pathological type, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor location, number and location(s) of metastasis, and previous chemotherapies were subject to observation. Survival analyses were performed via the Kaplan-Meier method. The toxicity were evaluated in all patients this study according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 4 (NCI CTC version 4.0).A total of 53 well-matched patients with advanced colorectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 6.0 months (2.0-16.0 months). The median PFS was significantly longer for apatinib group than for observation group (2.0 vs. 1.1 months; HR = 3.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-7.88; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups for median OS (5.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.56-1.90; P = .914). The disease control rate of the apatinib group was significantly better than that of the observation group (70.4% vs 26.9%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in the overall remission rate between the 2 groups (3.7% vs 0%, P = .322). Advanced colorectal cancer patients with 2 or fewer metastatic sites experienced longer PFS than those with more than 2 sites. High ECOG scores, cancer localization to the right side of colon and lymph node metastasis were associated with increased risk of death and all remained independent factors affecting OS. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension and hand-foot skin syndrome.Apatinib treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed chemotherapy achieved better disease control and prolonged PFS relative to untreated controls. The toxicity was manageable.
对于接受过2线或更多线化疗后疾病仍继续进展的晚期结直肠癌患者,目前尚无标准治疗方案。本研究旨在探讨阿帕替尼对至少2线先前化疗失败的晚期结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性。27例至少2线化疗失败的晚期结直肠癌患者接受阿帕替尼治疗(500mg/天)。作为对照,对26例具有可比临床基线特征(包括年龄、性别、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、病理类型、癌胚抗原(CEA)水平、肿瘤位置、转移数量和部位以及先前化疗情况)的晚期结直肠癌患者进行观察。通过Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。根据美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准4(NCI CTC版本4.0)对本研究中的所有患者进行毒性评估。
共对53例匹配良好的晚期结直肠癌患者进行回顾性分析。中位随访时间为6.0个月(2.0 - 16.0个月)。阿帕替尼组的中位无进展生存期显著长于观察组(2.0个月对1.1个月;HR = 3.88;95%置信区间[CI],1.91 - 7.88;P <.001)。然而,两组的中位总生存期无显著差异(5.0个月对4.0个月;HR = 1.03;95% CI,0.56 - 1.90;P = 0.914)。阿帕替尼组的疾病控制率显著优于观察组(70.4%对26.9%,P = 0.002)。两组的总体缓解率无显著差异(3.7%对0%,P = 0.322)。转移部位为2个或更少的晚期结直肠癌患者的无进展生存期长于转移部位超过2个的患者。高ECOG评分、癌症位于结肠右侧以及淋巴结转移与死亡风险增加相关,且均为影响总生存期的独立因素。最常见的3/4级治疗相关不良事件为高血压和手足皮肤综合征。
相对于未治疗的对照组,阿帕替尼治疗化疗失败的晚期结直肠癌患者可实现更好的疾病控制并延长无进展生存期。毒性是可控的。