Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, Va.
Jobst Vascular Institute, ProMedica Toledo Hospital, Toledo, Ohio.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jan;7(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Chronic, post-thrombotic iliofemoral and inferior vena caval obstruction is associated with debilitating morbidity. Venoplasty and stenting are often successful; however, in the presence of a diseased or occluded common femoral vein (CFV), failure is common. A hybrid operative procedure of open surgical CFV endovenectomy and endoluminal recanalization or bypass of the obstructed iliofemoral and vena caval segments has been developed and modified. The purpose of this report was to assess the technical evolution of this procedure on operative complications.
Thirty-one patients undergoing CFV endovenectomy and proximal ipsilateral endoluminal reconstruction (iliac, inferior vena caval) or contralateral outflow were analyzed. The initial techniques of patient management were compared with the present contemporary techniques, evaluating procedural complications and failures. The contemporary procedure evolved to include routine axial imaging, preoperative venography through the popliteal vein, preoperative passage of a guidewire or catheter into the patent vena cava, placement of an ipsilateral popliteal vein sheath for intraoperative and postoperative anticoagulation, routine patch closure, routine arteriovenous fistulas, routine completion intravascular ultrasound, and long-term anticoagulation with warfarin to a target international normalized ratio of 3.0 to 4.0. Procedure-related complications were compared between the initial and contemporary techniques.
Of 17 patients treated with the early techniques, 15 (88%) had major complications: 5 iliofemoral thromboses, 4 major wound bleeds, 4 wound infections, and 2 CFV stenoses requiring reintervention. One iliac vein rupture treated with a stent graft thrombosed. Of 14 patients treated with the contemporary techniques, 2 (14%; P = .006) had major complications: 1 bleed and 1 infected seroma. One intraoperative iliac vein rupture, treated with a second stent relining the first, remains patent.
Contemporary hybrid operative techniques for incapacitating post-thrombotic iliofemoral and vena caval obstruction increase procedural success and reduce complications compared with the initial approach. The contemporary techniques are recommended for patients undergoing hybrid operative management of post-thrombotic iliofemoral and vena caval occlusion involving the CFV.
慢性血栓后髂股和下腔静脉阻塞与衰弱性发病率有关。血管成形术和支架置入术通常是成功的;然而,在存在病变或闭塞的股总静脉 (CFV) 时,失败很常见。已经开发和改进了一种混合手术程序,即开放手术 CFV 血管内膜切除术和腔内再通或阻塞的髂股和腔静脉段的旁路。本报告的目的是评估该手术操作并发症的技术演变。
分析了 31 例接受 CFV 血管内膜切除术和同侧近端腔内重建(髂骨、下腔静脉)或对侧流出的患者。比较了患者管理的初始技术与当前的现代技术,评估了手术并发症和失败。现代技术演变为包括常规轴向成像、通过腘静脉进行术前静脉造影、在通畅的腔静脉中预先放置导丝或导管、放置同侧腘静脉护套进行术中术后抗凝、常规补片闭合、常规动静脉瘘、常规完成血管内超声检查以及长期使用华法林抗凝,目标国际标准化比值为 3.0 至 4.0。比较了初始技术和现代技术之间的与手术相关的并发症。
17 例采用早期技术治疗的患者中,有 15 例(88%)发生严重并发症:5 例髂股静脉血栓形成、4 例大出血、4 例伤口感染和 2 例 CFV 狭窄需再次介入治疗。1 例用支架移植物治疗的髂静脉破裂血栓形成。14 例采用现代技术治疗的患者中,有 2 例(14%;P=0.006)发生严重并发症:1 例出血,1 例感染性血清肿。1 例术中髂静脉破裂,用第二个支架重新衬里第一个支架,仍保持通畅。
与初始方法相比,用于治疗使人衰弱的血栓后髂股和腔静脉阻塞的现代混合手术技术提高了手术成功率并降低了并发症。建议对接受涉及 CFV 的血栓后髂股和腔静脉闭塞的混合手术治疗的患者采用现代技术。