Gergen Jessica, Falcao Joana, Rajkotia Yogesh
a ThinkWell , Maputo , Mozambique.
b Independent contractor , Maputo , Mozambique.
Afr J AIDS Res. 2018 Dec;17(4):353-361. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2018.1544574.
A performance-based financing (PBF) program was implemented for services for HIV, prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) and maternal/child health (MCH) in two provinces of Mozambique. This study investigates the determinants of policy scale-up to help accelerate the expansion of PBF in Mozambique and globally from pilot projects to national policies.
A retrospective policy programme analysis was carried out using in-depth key informant interviews. A total of 24 interviews were conducted with stakeholders from donor agencies, the implementing NGO, district and provincial health offices, and the Ministry of Health.
Stakeholders reported that the scale-up process of PBF was influenced by three key determinants: political power, financial sustainability, and available capacity and evidence. In Mozambique, PBF scaled-up provincially but not nationally due to these determinants. The adoption of PBF in Mozambique involved a restricted range of policy actors at the central level and was strongly driven by the donor and a PBF champion. Provincial scale-up was fostered by political support and increasing capacity over time.
There was a generalised ambivalence and lack of incentive to scale-up PBF from the implementing NGO. Coupled with the lack of evidence of a positive effect, and of cost-effectiveness in comparison with other models to improve health service delivery and health system strengthening, it is difficult to argue for the need to scale up the PBF programme studied. Care needs to be taken to base the adoption of health policies, including PBF, on a situational analysis and on evidence of intervention effectiveness, cost-benefits and contextual fit.
在莫桑比克的两个省份实施了基于绩效的融资(PBF)项目,用于艾滋病病毒(HIV)服务、预防母婴传播(PMTCT)以及孕产妇/儿童健康(MCH)服务。本研究调查政策扩大规模的决定因素,以帮助加速莫桑比克乃至全球从试点项目到国家政策的PBF扩展。
采用深入的关键信息提供者访谈进行回顾性政策项目分析。共对来自捐助机构、实施非政府组织、地区和省级卫生办公室以及卫生部的利益相关者进行了24次访谈。
利益相关者报告称,PBF的扩大规模过程受到三个关键决定因素的影响:政治权力、财政可持续性以及可用能力和证据。在莫桑比克,由于这些决定因素,PBF在省级层面得以扩大,但未在全国范围内扩大。莫桑比克采用PBF涉及中央层面范围有限的政策行为者,并且在很大程度上由捐助方和一位PBF倡导者推动。省级层面的扩大规模得益于政治支持以及随着时间推移能力的提升。
实施非政府组织普遍对扩大PBF持矛盾态度且缺乏动力。再加上缺乏积极效果的证据,以及与其他改善卫生服务提供和加强卫生系统的模式相比缺乏成本效益,因此很难主张扩大所研究的PBF项目的必要性。在采用包括PBF在内的卫生政策时,需要谨慎地基于情况分析以及干预效果、成本效益和与背景契合度的证据。