Suppr超能文献

应用双能 CT 评价肺血栓栓塞症患者的血管参数。

Evaluation of Vascular Parameters in Patients With Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease Using Dual-energy Computed Tomography.

机构信息

Section of Thoracic Imaging, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic.

Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic.

出版信息

J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Nov;34(6):367-372. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000383.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patterns of vascular and lung parenchymal enhancement in patients with suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and in those with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and compare those two groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 186 thoracic DECT studies referred for evaluation of CTEPH or pulmonary hypertension. A total of 80 of these patients had a negative scan (control group), 13 had acute PE, and 53 had chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED)/CTEPH. Five different DECT-based parameters were evaluated that highlight patterns of vascular kinetics. Specifically, total DECT-based parenchymal attenuation in Hounsfield Unit (HU) (LungHU), percentage of perfused blood volume (PBV), peak enhancement of main pulmonary artery (PApeak in HU), maximum enhancement corresponding to 100 (PAmax), and the ratio of PApeak to LungHU were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with negative CT, patients with CTED/CTEPH tended to have lower LungHU (median: 27 vs. 38, P<0.001), lower PBV (median: 39 vs. 51, P=0.003), and higher PApeak/LungHU ratio (median: 17 vs. 13, P=0.003). Compared with patients with acute PE, patients with CTED/CTEPH tended to have lower LungHU (median: 27 vs. 39, P=0.006), lower PBV (median: 39 vs. 62, P=0.023), and higher PApeak/LungHU ratio (median: 17 vs. 11, P=0.023). No statistically significant differences were observed between patients with acute PE and those with negative CT.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT-based vascular parameters offer the potential to differentiate patients with acute versus chronic PE. These various anatomic and functional vascular DECT-based parameters might be reflective of the state of the underlying vascular bed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估疑似慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者和急性肺栓塞(PE)患者的血管和肺实质增强模式,并对这两组患者进行比较。

材料与方法

我们回顾性研究了 186 例因 CTEPH 或肺动脉高压而进行 DECT 检查的患者。其中 80 例患者的扫描结果为阴性(对照组),13 例患者为急性 PE,53 例患者为慢性血栓栓塞性疾病(CTED)/CTEPH。共评估了 5 种不同的基于 DECT 的参数,这些参数突出了血管动力学的模式。具体来说,计算了基于 DECT 的肺实质衰减的总 HU(HU)值(肺 HU)、灌注血容量百分比(PBV)、主肺动脉峰值增强(PApeak HU)、与 100 对应的最大增强(PAmax)和 PApeak/LungHU 比值。

结果

与 CT 阴性患者相比,CTED/CTEPH 患者的肺 HU 值(中位数:27 比 38,P<0.001)、PBV(中位数:39 比 51,P=0.003)和 PApeak/LungHU 比值(中位数:17 比 13,P=0.003)均较低。与急性 PE 患者相比,CTED/CTEPH 患者的肺 HU 值(中位数:27 比 39,P=0.006)、PBV(中位数:39 比 62,P=0.023)和 PApeak/LungHU 比值(中位数:17 比 11,P=0.023)均较低。急性 PE 患者与 CT 阴性患者之间无统计学差异。

结论

基于 DECT 的血管参数具有区分急性与慢性 PE 的潜力。这些不同的基于 DECT 的解剖和功能血管参数可能反映了潜在血管床的状态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验