Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec 18;47(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0321-8.
Organ preserving surgery (OPS) and radiotherapy (RT) are both accepted treatment options for early stage supraglottic cancer (SGC). Radiation has supplanted surgery in most cases, because of the perception that surgery results in poorer functional outcomes. However, evidence suggests that OPS with a neck dissection may be associated with improved survival. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare functional outcomes of OPS and RT for early SGC.
We searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies. Studies were included if they reported functional outcomes on 10 or more patients with early stage SGC treated with radiation or OPS, including open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Two reviewers independently screened articles for relevance using pre-determined criteria.
From 7720 references, we included 10 articles (n = 640 patients). 50% (n = 320) of patients were treated with surgery. Three head-to-head RT versus OPS papers were included, however different outcome measures were used for each group. Intractable aspiration management (including total laryngectomy or permanent tracheostomy) following OPS was reported in five papers representing 186 patients; the definitive intractable aspiration management rate was 2.6% (95% CI 1.0-6.8%). Four papers reported permanent G-tube rate for the surgical group (n = 198), calculating a rate of 5.3% (95% CI 2.6-10.5%), this was not reported for the RT group in any papers. One study reported quality of life. Two studies reported objective voice measures.
This systematic review revealed a paucity of objective measures and significant data heterogeneity, rendering the comparison of functional outcomes following OPS versus RT for early SGC limited. Future research should include objective measures of functional outcomes including laryngectomy rate, g-tube rate, tracheostomy dependence, quality of life, and voice quality measures.
器官保留手术(OPS)和放疗(RT)都是早期声门上型癌症(SGC)的可接受治疗选择。由于认为手术会导致更差的功能结果,因此放射治疗在大多数情况下取代了手术。然而,有证据表明,行颈部解剖的 OPS 可能与改善生存相关。我们的目的是对文献进行系统回顾,以比较早期 SGC 的 OPS 和 RT 的功能结果。
我们在 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中搜索了研究。如果研究报告了 10 例或更多接受放射或 OPS 治疗的早期 SGC 患者的功能结果,包括开放性部分喉切除术、经口激光显微手术(TLM)或经口机器人手术(TORS),则将其纳入研究。两名评审员使用预定标准独立筛选文章的相关性。
从 7720 篇参考文献中,我们纳入了 10 篇文章(n=640 例患者)。50%(n=320)的患者接受了手术治疗。纳入了 3 篇头对头 RT 与 OPS 的论文,然而每组使用的结果测量方法不同。5 篇文章报告了 OPS 后难治性吸入管理(包括全喉切除术或永久性气管造口术);186 例患者的确定性难治性吸入管理率为 2.6%(95%CI 1.0-6.8%)。4 篇文章报告了手术组的永久性 G 管率(n=198),计算出 5.3%(95%CI 2.6-10.5%),但在任何一篇 RT 组的文章中都没有报道。1 项研究报告了生活质量。2 项研究报告了客观的声音测量结果。
本系统评价显示客观测量方法不足且数据异质性显著,限制了 OPS 与 RT 治疗早期 SGC 的功能结果比较。未来的研究应包括功能结果的客观测量,包括喉切除术率、G 管率、气管造口术依赖、生活质量和声音质量测量。