J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(6):511-518. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41611.
To evaluate two different techniques for glass fiber-reinforced resin post (FRC) insertion by assessing the stress distribution under polymerization shrinkage or masticatory loading and measuring the pull-out bond strength to dentin.
A model of an endodontically treated maxillary central incisor was used for three-dimensional simulation with two conditions: conventionally cemented (FRC) and relined (RFRC). The volumetric solids were exported to analysis software (ANSYS 17.2, ANSYS) in STEP (Standard for the Exchange of Product Data) format. All contacts were considered perfectly bonded between the geometries. Numerical models received a load of 100 N (45 degrees) on the lingual surface. The composite cement polymerization shrinkage was simulated by thermal analogy to obtain Von Mises, maximum principal stress, and shear stress. For in vitro evaluation, a pull-out bond strength test (n = 20/N = 40) was performed (50 Kgf, 1 mm/min) after mechanical cycling (in water at 37°C, 84 N, 2 bar, 45 degrees, 106 cycles, 4 Hz), and failure analysis was subsequently performed. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α < 0.05).
The FRC group showed more stress concentration in the cement layer. The RFRC group [(32 ± 13); (288 ± 129)] presented better performance than the FRC group [(6 ± 7); (152 ± 87)] for stress distribution and bond strength (p < 0.05). Adhesive and mixed failures occurred in both groups.
Relined fiberglass posts reduced the stress generated by polymerization shrinkage and showed greater bond strength to dentin.
通过评估聚合收缩或咀嚼负荷下的应力分布以及测量对牙本质的拔出粘结强度,来评估两种不同的玻璃纤维增强树脂桩(FRC)插入技术。
使用经过根管治疗的上颌中切牙模型进行三维模拟,有两种情况:常规粘结(FRC)和重新衬里(RFRC)。将体积固体以 STEP(产品数据交换标准)格式导出到分析软件(ANSYS 17.2,ANSYS)中。所有接触都被认为是几何形状之间的完全粘结。数值模型在舌侧表面受到 100 N(45 度)的负载。通过热模拟模拟复合胶聚合收缩,以获得 Von Mises、最大主应力和剪切应力。为了进行体外评估,在机械循环(37°C 水,84 N,2 bar,45 度,106 次循环,4 Hz)后进行了拔出粘结强度测试(n = 20/N = 40)(50 Kgf,1 mm/min),随后进行了失效分析。使用单向方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α < 0.05)对结果进行分析。
FRC 组在粘结层中显示出更大的应力集中。RFRC 组[(32 ± 13);(288 ± 129)]在应力分布和粘结强度方面优于 FRC 组[(6 ± 7);(152 ± 87)](p < 0.05)。两组均发生了粘结和混合失效。
重新衬里的玻璃纤维桩减少了聚合收缩产生的应力,并显示出对牙本质更强的粘结强度。