Suppr超能文献

家务协助需求的职业疗法法医学评估:焦点小组观点

Occupational therapy medicolegal assessment of domestic assistance requirements: Focus group perspectives.

作者信息

Arnold Susan, Mackenzie Lynette, Millington Michael, James Carole

机构信息

Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia.

School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Apr;66(2):239-248. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12552. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Estimating domestic assistance requirements within the medicolegal field is a role for occupational therapists. It is a complex multidimensional process of clinical reasoning with no published research outlining how an occupational therapist translates assessment data into the number of hours of domestic assistance required. This study describes the current occupational therapy practice of estimating domestic assistance hours within the medicolegal context.

METHOD

Three focus groups, totalling 14 occupational therapists providing medicolegal reports in New South Wales, were conducted. Sydney University provided ethics approval. Focus group data were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: Tasks included as housework. Assessment process - interview of pre-injury and recovery status; functional performance on specific tasks and a tour of the home. Influential factors - include legal system restrictions, medical management, cultural and society values, family expectations, location and impact of diagnosis. Strategies to determine care - triangulation of observed data with medical reports and clinical experience. Knowledge of community and own performance times within the framework of occupational therapy philosophy DISCUSSION: No single method of translating assessment data to hours of care was identified. Therapists use of their own housework performance raises ethical issues. Use of claimant only statements raises issues of inaccurate data on which to base decisions. Therapists should refer to occupational therapy process of clinical reasoning to explain their recommendations even though the reasoning does not give a definite number of care hours.

CONCLUSION

Therapists need to understand the factors influencing their clinical reasoning when integrating all available information into an estimating of domestic assistance hours. Further study analysing the content of medicolegal report may provide information as to how therapists document their clinical reasoning for court.

摘要

背景/目的:评估法医学领域内的家庭护理需求是职业治疗师的一项职责。这是一个复杂的多维度临床推理过程,目前尚无已发表的研究概述职业治疗师如何将评估数据转化为所需的家庭护理小时数。本研究描述了在法医学背景下估计家庭护理小时数的当前职业治疗实践。

方法

开展了三个焦点小组,共有14名在新南威尔士州提供法医学报告的职业治疗师参与。悉尼大学提供了伦理批准。对焦点小组数据进行了主题分析。

结果

确定了四个主题:作为家务的任务。评估过程——对受伤前和恢复状况的访谈;特定任务的功能表现以及对住所的巡查。影响因素——包括法律制度限制、医疗管理、文化和社会价值观、家庭期望、地点以及诊断的影响。确定护理的策略——将观察到的数据与医学报告和临床经验进行三角测量。在职业治疗理念框架内了解社区情况和自身执行时间。讨论:未确定将评估数据转化为护理小时数的单一方法。治疗师运用自身家务执行情况引发了伦理问题。仅使用索赔人的陈述会引发决策所依据数据不准确的问题。尽管推理并未给出确切的护理小时数,但治疗师应参考职业治疗的临床推理过程来解释其建议。

结论

治疗师在将所有可用信息整合到家庭护理小时数估计中时,需要了解影响其临床推理的因素。进一步分析法医学报告内容的研究可能会提供有关治疗师如何为法庭记录其临床推理的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验