Hadler James L, Clogher Paula, Huang Jennifer, Libby Tanya, Cronquist Alicia, Wilson Siri, Ryan Patricia, Saupe Amy, Nicholson Cyndy, McGuire Suzanne, Shiferaw Beletshachew, Dunn John, Hurd Sharon
Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 3;5(7):ofy148. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy148. eCollection 2018 Jul.
The relationship between socioeconomic status and Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) is not well understood. However, recent studies in Connecticut and New York City found that as census tract poverty (CTP) decreased, rates of STEC increased. To explore this nationally, we analyzed surveillance data from laboratory-confirmed cases of STEC from 2010-2014 for all Foodborne Disease Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) sites, population 47.9 million.
Case residential data were geocoded and linked to CTP level (2010-2014 American Community Survey). Relative rates were calculated comparing incidence in census tracts with <20% of residents below poverty with those with ≥20%. Relative rates of age-adjusted 5-year incidence per 100 000 population were determined for all STEC, hospitalized only and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) cases overall, by demographic features, FoodNet site, and surveillance year.
There were 5234 cases of STEC; 26.3% were hospitalized, and 5.9% had HUS. Five-year incidence was 10.9/100 000 population. Relative STEC rates for the <20% compared with the ≥20% CTP group were >1.0 for each age group, FoodNet site, surveillance year, and race/ethnic group except Asian. Relative hospitalization and HUS rates tended to be higher than their respective STEC relative rates.
Persons living in lower CTP were at higher risk of STEC than those in the highest poverty census tracts. This is unlikely to be due to health care-seeking or diagnostic bias as it applies to analysis limited to hospitalized and HUS cases. Research is needed to better understand exposure differences between people living in the lower vs highest poverty-level census tracts to help direct prevention efforts.
社会经济地位与产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)之间的关系尚未完全明确。然而,最近在康涅狄格州和纽约市进行的研究发现,随着人口普查区贫困率(CTP)的下降,STEC的发病率有所上升。为了在全国范围内探究这一现象,我们分析了2010年至2014年期间所有食源性疾病主动监测网络(FoodNet)站点的STEC实验室确诊病例的监测数据,覆盖人口达4790万。
将病例的居住数据进行地理编码,并与CTP水平(2010 - 2014年美国社区调查)相关联。计算相对发病率,比较贫困居民比例低于20%的人口普查区与贫困居民比例≥20%的人口普查区的发病率。按人口统计学特征、FoodNet站点和监测年份,确定所有STEC病例、仅住院病例以及溶血尿毒综合征(HUS)病例每10万人口年龄调整后的5年发病率的相对率。
共有5234例STEC病例;26.3%的病例住院治疗,5.9%的病例患有HUS。5年发病率为每10万人口10.9例。除亚洲人外,每个年龄组、FoodNet站点、监测年份和种族/族裔组中,贫困居民比例<20%的组与贫困居民比例≥20%的组相比,STEC相对率均>1.0。相对住院率和HUS率往往高于各自的STEC相对率。
生活在CTP较低地区的人群感染STEC的风险高于贫困率最高的人口普查区的人群。这不太可能是由于就医或诊断偏差导致的,因为该分析仅限于住院病例和HUS病例。需要开展研究以更好地了解生活在贫困水平较低与较高的人口普查区的人群之间的暴露差异,从而有助于指导预防工作。