Suppr超能文献

超声骨刀在颈椎后路椎板切除减压融合术中的安全性和有效性

[Safety and effectiveness of ultrasonic osteotome in posterior cervical laminectomy decompression and fusion].

作者信息

Zhu Jinwen, Hao Dingjun, Guo Yunshan, Zhang Xinliang, Gao Wenjie, Wang Xiaodong

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical College, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054, P.R.China.

Department of Spinal Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical College, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054,

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 15;32(12):1554-1559. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201804012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety of ultrasonic osteotome used in posterior cervical laminectomy decompression surgery and its effect on surgical outcome.

METHODS

A clinical data of 52 patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine (C-OPLL) undergoing posterior cervical laminectomy decompression and fusion (PCLDF) between April 2013 and April 2017 was retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether using the ultrasonic osteotome during operation: group A (20 cases, ultrasonic osteotome group) and group B (32 cases, traditional gun-clamp decompression group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body weight, height, preoperative hemoglobin, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups ( >0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospitalization time, complications, hemoglobin at 1 day after operation, and JOA score at 6 months after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups, and the improvement rate of JOA was calculated.

RESULTS

The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were significantly less than those in group B ( <0.05); there was no significant difference in the drainage volume and hospitalization time between the two groups ( >0.05). The hemoglobin of group B was slightly higher than that of group A at 1 day after operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( =-1.260, =0.214). All the patients were followed up 6-10 months (mean, 7.6 months). No serious complications such as C nerve paralysis, dural tear, infection, epidural hematoma, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, transfusion allergy, or shock occurred during and after operation. The JOA scores of the two groups were significant improved at 6 months after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( <0.05), and there was no significant difference in JOA score and improvement rate between the two groups at 6 months after operation ( >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional gun-clamp decompression, the effectiveness of PCLDF in treatment of C-OPLL by using ultrasonic osteotome is comparable, but the latter can effectively reduce the operation time and blood loss.

摘要

目的

探讨超声骨刀在颈椎后路椎板切除减压手术中的安全性及其对手术效果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年4月至2017年4月期间52例行颈椎后路椎板切除减压融合术(PCLDF)的颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(C-OPLL)患者的临床资料。根据术中是否使用超声骨刀将患者分为两组:A组(20例,超声骨刀组)和B组(32例,传统枪钳减压组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、体重、身高、术前血红蛋白及日本骨科协会(JOA)评分方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间、并发症、术后1天血红蛋白及术后6个月JOA评分,并计算JOA改善率。

结果

A组手术时间和术中出血量明显少于B组(<0.05);两组引流量和住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后1天B组血红蛋白略高于A组,但两组差异无统计学意义(=-1.260,=0.214)。所有患者均获随访6~10个月(平均7.6个月)。手术中和术后均未发生严重并发症,如C神经麻痹、硬脊膜撕裂、感染、硬膜外血肿、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、输血过敏或休克等。两组患者术后6个月JOA评分与术前比较均显著改善(<0.05),术后6个月两组JOA评分及改善率比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

与传统枪钳减压相比,超声骨刀用于PCLDF治疗C-OPLL的疗效相当,但可有效缩短手术时间和减少术中出血量。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验