• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死术后左心室舒张末期压升高的目标治疗:一项一期安全性和可行性研究。

Targeting elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - a phase one safety and feasibility study.

机构信息

John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.

The University of Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(7):758-763. doi: 10.1177/2048872618819657. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1177/2048872618819657
PMID:30569736
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an independent predictor of mortality and heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether lowering elevated LVEDP improves outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS

This non-randomized, single blinded study with prospective enrolment and sequential group allocation recruited patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with LVEDP ⩾ 20 mmHg measured immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The intervention arm (=10) received furosemide 40 mg intravenous bolus plus escalating doses of glyceryl trinitrate (100 µg per min to a maximum of 1000 µg) during simultaneous measurement of LVEDP. The control group (=10) received corresponding normal saline boluses with simultaneous measurement of LVEDP (10 readings over 10 min). Efficacy endpoints were final LVEDP achieved, and the dose of glyceryl trinitrate needed to reduce LVEDP by ⩾ 20%. Safety endpoint was symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg).

RESULTS

From 1 April 2017 to 23 August 2017 we enrolled 20 patients (age: 64±9 years, males: 60%, =12, anterior STEMI: 65%, =13). The mean LVEDP for the whole cohort (=20) was 29±4 mmHg (intervention group: 28±3 mmHg . control group: 31±5 mmHg; =0.1). The LVEDP dropped from 28±3 to 16±2 mmHg in the glyceryl trinitrate + furosemide group ( <0.01) but remained unchanged in the control group. The median dose of glyceryl trinitrate required to produce ⩾ 20% reduction in LVEDP in the intervention group was 200 µg (range: 100-800). One patient experienced asymptomatic decline in systolic blood pressure to below 90 mmHg. There was no correlation between LVEDP and left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

The administration of glyceryl trinitrate plus furosemide in patients with elevated LVEDP following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI safely reduces LVEDP.

摘要

简介

左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)升高是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者死亡和心力衰竭的独立预测因子。降低升高的 LVEDP 是否能改善预后尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项非随机、单盲、前瞻性入组和序贯分组的研究,纳入了因 STEMI 行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)且 LVEDP ⩾20mmHg 的患者。LVEDP 在 pPCI 后即刻测量。干预组(=10)在同时测量 LVEDP 的情况下接受呋塞米 40mg 静脉推注加硝酸甘油递增剂量(100μg/min,最大 1000μg)。对照组(=10)在同时测量 LVEDP(10 次读数,共 10min)的情况下接受相应的生理盐水推注。有效性终点为最终 LVEDP 水平,以及降低 LVEDP ⩾20%所需的硝酸甘油剂量。安全性终点为症状性低血压(收缩压 ⩽90mmHg)。

结果

从 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 8 月 23 日,我们共纳入 20 例患者(年龄:64±9 岁,男性:60%,=12,前壁 STEMI:65%,=13)。整个队列的平均 LVEDP(=20)为 29±4mmHg(干预组:28±3mmHg,对照组:31±5mmHg,=0.1)。硝酸甘油+呋塞米组的 LVEDP 从 28±3mmHg 降至 16±2mmHg( <0.01),而对照组无变化。干预组降低 LVEDP ⩾20%所需的硝酸甘油中位剂量为 200μg(范围:100-800)。1 例患者出现无症状收缩压下降至 90mmHg 以下。LVEDP 与左心室射血分数之间无相关性。

结论

在 STEMI 行直接 pPCI 后,LVEDP 升高的患者应用硝酸甘油加呋塞米治疗可安全降低 LVEDP。

相似文献

1
Targeting elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - a phase one safety and feasibility study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死术后左心室舒张末期压升高的目标治疗:一项一期安全性和可行性研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(7):758-763. doi: 10.1177/2048872618819657. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Combined assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and ejection fraction by left ventriculography predicts long-term outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.通过左心室造影联合评估左心室舒张末期压力和射血分数可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期预后。
Heart Vessels. 2018 May;33(5):453-461. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1080-6. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
Natural history and prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) II randomized controlled trial.再灌注 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室舒张末期压的自然史和预后意义:心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)Ⅱ随机对照试验分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 17;21(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02046-x.
4
Relation of Ratio of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure to Long-Term Prognosis After ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.左心室射血分数与左心室舒张末期压力比值与 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者长期预后的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 15;123(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
5
Ratio of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时收缩压与左心室舒张末期压力的比值可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):389-395. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26963. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Relationship of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with extent of myocardial ischemia, myocardial salvage and long-term outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室舒张末期压与心肌缺血程度、心肌挽救及长期预后的关系。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):901-909. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28098. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Clinical factors affecting left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.影响急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室舒张末期压的临床因素。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;9(4):1834-1840. doi: 10.21037/apm.2020.03.22. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
8
Association of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者左心室舒张末期压与死亡率的关系。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):E439-E446. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28839. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
9
Prognostic utility of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时左心室舒张末期压的预后价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
10
The association of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with global longitudinal strain and scintigraphic infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,左心室舒张末期压力与整体纵向应变和闪烁扫描梗死面积的相关性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;37(1):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01945-y. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Hunter LVEDP Study): a prospective, single-centre study.左心室舒张末期压力对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响(亨特左心室舒张末期压力研究):一项前瞻性单中心研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 5;15(7):e090465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090465.
2
Improvement in LV end-diastolic pressure after primary PCI and its impact on patients' recovery.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室舒张末期压力的改善及其对患者恢复的影响。
Br J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 29;30(4):43. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2023.043. eCollection 2023.
3
Natural history and prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) II randomized controlled trial.
再灌注 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室舒张末期压的自然史和预后意义:心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)Ⅱ随机对照试验分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 17;21(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02046-x.