a Department of Cognitive Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna , Tenerife , Spain.
b Instituto Universitario de Neurociencia (IUNE), Universidad de La Laguna , Tenerife , Spain.
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1481-1488. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1558045. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
We investigated the time course of selective attention to face regions during judgment of dis/approval by low (LSA) and high (HSA) social anxiety undergraduates (with clinical levels on questionnaire measures). The viewers' gaze direction was assessed and the stimulus visual saliency of face regions was computed, for video-clips displaying dynamic facial expressions. Social anxiety was related to perception of disapproval from faces with an ambiguous smile (i.e. with non-happy eyes), but not those with congruent happy eyes and a smile. HSA observers selectively looked earlier at the eye region, whereas LSA ones preferentially looked at the smiling mouth. Consistently, gaze allocation was related to visual saliency of the smile for HSA than for LSA viewers. The attentional bias towards the less salient eye region - thus opposing the automatic capture by the smile - suggests that it is strategically driven in HSA individuals, possibly aimed at detecting negative evaluators.
我们考察了低(LSA)和高(HSA)社交焦虑症本科生在判断赞成/不赞成时对面部区域的选择性注意的时间进程(通过问卷测量具有临床水平)。评估了观察者的注视方向,并计算了显示动态面部表情的视频片段中面部区域的刺激视觉显著性。社交焦虑与对带有模棱两可微笑(即眼睛不快乐)的面孔的不赞成感知有关,但与具有一致的快乐眼睛和微笑的面孔无关。HSA 观察者选择性地更早地看向眼睛区域,而 LSA 观察者则更倾向于看微笑的嘴巴。一致的是,注视分配与 HSA 观察者的微笑视觉显著性相关,而不是 LSA 观察者。对不太显著的眼睛区域的注意力偏向 - 因此与微笑的自动捕捉相反 - 表明在 HSA 个体中它是策略性驱动的,可能旨在检测负面评价者。