• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童心理理论的发展与教学证据选择。

Children's developing theory of mind and pedagogical evidence selection.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Black Pine Circle School.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2019 Feb;55(2):286-302. doi: 10.1037/dev0000642. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1037/dev0000642
PMID:30570296
Abstract

Natural pedagogy emerges early in development, but teaching requires tailoring evidence to learners' knowledge. How does the ability to reason about others' minds support early pedagogical evidence selection abilities? In 3 experiments ( = 205), we investigated preschool-aged children's ability to consider others' knowledge when selecting evidence in the service of teaching. Results from Experiment 1 revealed that 4-year-olds reliably selected evidence to rectify others' false beliefs, and provided causal explanations in their teaching, whereas 3-year-olds did not. In Experiment 2, we tie children's evidence selection abilities to theory of mind (ToM) development, above and beyond effects of age and numerical conservation abilities. In Experiment 3, we employed a 6-week training of children's pedagogical evidence selection with a new teaching task, and further explored the relationship between these skills and children's ToM abilities. We qualitatively replicated our results from Experiment 2 and report tentative evidence for a link between the pedagogical training and improvements in ToM. Together, our findings suggest important connections between reasoning about others' minds and evidential reasoning in natural pedagogy during early childhood. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

自然教学法很早就出现了,但教学需要根据学习者的知识来调整证据。推理他人思维的能力如何支持早期的教学证据选择能力?在 3 项实验中(n=205),我们研究了学龄前儿童在教学服务中选择证据时考虑他人知识的能力。实验 1 的结果表明,4 岁的儿童能够可靠地选择证据来纠正他人的错误信念,并在教学中提供因果解释,而 3 岁的儿童则不能。在实验 2 中,我们将儿童的证据选择能力与心理理论(ToM)的发展联系起来,而不仅仅是年龄和数字守恒能力的影响。在实验 3 中,我们对儿童的教学证据选择进行了为期 6 周的培训,并采用了一个新的教学任务,进一步探讨了这些技能与儿童的 ToM 能力之间的关系。我们在实验 2 中定性地复制了我们的结果,并报告了教学培训与 ToM 能力提高之间存在联系的初步证据。总之,我们的发现表明,在儿童早期,推理他人思维和自然教学中的证据推理之间存在着重要的联系。

相似文献

1
Children's developing theory of mind and pedagogical evidence selection.儿童心理理论的发展与教学证据选择。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Feb;55(2):286-302. doi: 10.1037/dev0000642. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
The link between preschoolers' executive function and theory of mind and the role of epistemic states.学龄前儿童的执行功能和心理理论之间的联系以及认知状态的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):513-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
3
Developing an understanding of others' emotional states: Relations among affective theory of mind and empathy measures in early childhood.发展对他人情绪状态的理解:幼儿时期情感心理理论和同理心测量之间的关系。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;38(2):151-166. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12322. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Development of children's sensitivity to overinformativeness in learning and teaching.发展儿童在学习和教学中对过度信息量的敏感性。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;54(11):2113-2125. doi: 10.1037/dev0000580. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
The effect of peers' theory of mind on children's own theory of mind development: A longitudinal study in middle childhood and early adolescence.同伴的心理理论对儿童自身心理理论发展的影响:儿童中期和青少年早期的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jul;60(7):1269-1278. doi: 10.1037/dev0001758. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence.心理理论、语言和阅读:从幼儿期到青春期早期的发展关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Mar;191:104739. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104739. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Children's developing knowledge of and reflection about teaching.儿童对教学的认知发展与反思
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Mar;143:111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
8
How do preschoolers' sharing behaviors relate to their theory of mind understanding?幼儿的分享行为与他们的心理理论理解有什么关系?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Apr;120:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
9
Executive function depletion in children and its impact on theory of mind.儿童的执行功能耗竭及其对心理理论的影响。
Cognition. 2017 Jul;164:150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
Individual Differences in Children's Understanding of Guilt: Links with Theory of Mind.儿童对内疚感理解的个体差异:与心理理论的联系。
J Genet Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;179(4):219-229. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1474848.

引用本文的文献

1
Picture book reading improves children's learning understanding.阅读绘本有助于提高孩子的学习理解能力。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Mar;43(1):12-35. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12479. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
The Development of Cumulative Cultural Learning.累积性文化学习的发展
Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;1:119-147. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084848. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Four-year-olds selectively transmit true information.四岁儿童具有选择性地传递真实信息的能力。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284694. eCollection 2023.
4
Young children infer and manage what others think about them.幼儿会推断和管理他人对他们的看法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2105642119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105642119. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognition training success across the healthy lifespan.一项针对健康寿命范围内社会认知训练成功的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 3;12(1):3544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07420-z.
6
Development of cool and hot theory of mind and cool and hot inhibitory control abilities from 3.5 to 6.5 years of age.从 3.5 岁到 6.5 岁儿童冷热点思维理论和冷热点抑制控制能力的发展。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262251. eCollection 2022.
7
When a Circle Becomes the Letter O: Young Children's Conceptualization of Learning and Its Relation With Theory of Mind Development.当一个圆圈变成字母O:幼儿对学习的概念化及其与心理理论发展的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:596419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596419. eCollection 2020.
8
Young children consider the expected utility of others' learning to decide what to teach.幼儿根据他人学习的预期效用来决定教什么。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):144-152. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0748-6. Epub 2019 Oct 14.