Suppr超能文献

氮卓斯汀、氯苯那敏和安慰剂治疗春季变应性鼻炎的多中心、双盲、多剂量、平行组疗效与安全性试验

Multicenter, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel-groups efficacy and safety trial of azelastine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Weiler J M, Donnelly A, Campbell B H, Connell J T, Diamond L, Hamilton L H, Rosenthal R R, Hemsworth G R, Perhach J L

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 Nov;82(5 Pt 1):801-11. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90082-6.

Abstract

Azelastine, a novel antiallergic medication, was compared with chlorpheniramine maleate and placebo for efficacy and safety in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis in a multicenter, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel-groups study. One hundred fifty-five subjects participated. Subjects ranged in age from 18 to 60 years of age and had at least a 2-year history of spring allergic rhinitis, confirmed by positive skin test to spring aeroallergens. Medications were given four times daily; the azelastine groups received 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg in the morning and evening with placebo in the early and late afternoon; the chlorpheniramine group received 4.0 mg four times daily. Daily subject symptom cards were completed during a screening period to assess pretreatment symptoms and during a 4-week treatment period while subjects received study medications. Individual symptoms, total symptoms, and major symptoms were compared to determine efficacy of medication. Elicited, volunteered, and observed adverse experiences were recorded for each subject and compared among groups. Vital signs, body weights, serum chemistry values, complete blood cell counts, urine studies, and electrocardiograms were obtained for each subject and compared among groups. Symptoms relief in the group receiving the highest concentration of azelastine (2.0 mg twice daily) was statistically greater than in the placebo group during all weeks of the study. Lower doses of azelastine were statistically more effective than placebo only during portions of the first 3 weeks of the study. In contrast, although the chlorpheniramine group did have fewer symptoms than the placebo group during the study, the difference never reached statistical significance during any week of the study. There were no serious side effects in any of the treatment groups. Drowsiness and altered taste perception were increased significantly over placebo only in the high-dose azelastine group. Azelastine appears to be a safe, efficacious medication for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

摘要

在一项多中心、双盲、多剂量、平行组研究中,对新型抗过敏药物氮卓斯汀与马来酸氯苯那敏及安慰剂治疗春季过敏性鼻炎的疗效和安全性进行了比较。155名受试者参与了研究。受试者年龄在18至60岁之间,有至少2年的春季过敏性鼻炎病史,经对春季气传变应原皮肤试验呈阳性证实。药物每日给药4次;氮卓斯汀组早晚分别服用0.5、1.0或2.0毫克,下午早晚服用安慰剂;氯苯那敏组每日4次服用4.0毫克。在筛选期填写每日受试者症状卡以评估治疗前症状,并在4周治疗期受试者服用研究药物期间填写。比较个体症状、总症状和主要症状以确定药物疗效。记录每个受试者诱发、自发和观察到的不良经历并在组间进行比较。为每个受试者获取生命体征、体重、血清化学值、全血细胞计数、尿液检查和心电图并在组间进行比较。在研究的所有周中,接受最高浓度氮卓斯汀(每日2次,每次2.0毫克)组的症状缓解在统计学上均大于安慰剂组。仅在研究的前3周部分时间,较低剂量的氮卓斯汀在统计学上比安慰剂更有效。相比之下,尽管氯苯那敏组在研究期间症状确实比安慰剂组少,但在研究的任何一周差异均未达到统计学显著性。任何治疗组均未出现严重副作用。仅高剂量氮卓斯汀组的嗜睡和味觉改变比安慰剂组显著增加。氮卓斯汀似乎是一种治疗季节性过敏性鼻炎的安全、有效药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验