Laura Licon Anna, Defoor Dewayne, Ford John, Crownover Richard, Li Ying, Ha Chul, Eng Tony, Jones William, Mavroidis Panayiotis, Papanikolaou Niko, Stathakis Sotirios
University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J BUON. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):1460-1466.
To develop and validate an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plan quantitative score using QUANTEC dose/volume parameters to assess plan quality.
132 IMRT and volumetric modulated Arc therapy (VMAT) patient plans of various treatment sites were evaluated. The optimized plan's dose volume histogram (DVH) was exported to Velocity for evaluation. The proposed scoring was based on calculating the shortest distance from the QUANTEC objective to the DVH line of each organ. Each plan was normalized against the ideal plan where the organs at risk (OARs) received no dose and hence the distance between the QUANTEC objective and the DVH line was maximized. These normalized scores enabled the comparison of the quality of plans across treatment sites and dosimetrists. The scores were plotted and statistically analyzed to serve as a basis for future research.
The score for each treatment site was evaluated and the average percentage scores±SD were found to be 43.5 ± 21.0, 33.3 ± 31.7, 42.6 ± 23.3, 40.2 ± 24.4, 33.5 ± 23.5 for the sites of abdomen, brain, chest, head/neck, and pelvis respectively. Differences in scores between the treatment sites were largely attributed to OAR segmentation and proximity of the OAR to the planning target volume (PTV). Small score differences between dosimetrists were attributed to the number of plans they have completed.
This approach allows comparison of patient treatments which will help improve patient care and treatment outcomes. A larger sample of treatment plans is being evaluated to investigate the effect of dosimetrist's experience on plan quality.
利用QUANTEC剂量/体积参数制定并验证一种调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗计划定量评分系统,以评估计划质量。
对132例不同治疗部位的IMRT和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)患者计划进行评估。将优化后的计划剂量体积直方图(DVH)导出至Velocity进行评估。所提议的评分基于计算从QUANTEC目标到每个器官DVH线的最短距离。每个计划均相对于理想计划进行归一化处理,在理想计划中,危及器官(OARs)未接受任何剂量,因此QUANTEC目标与DVH线之间的距离最大化。这些归一化评分能够比较不同治疗部位和剂量师的计划质量。对评分进行绘图和统计分析,为未来研究提供依据。
评估了每个治疗部位的评分,发现腹部、脑、胸部、头/颈和骨盆部位的平均百分比评分±标准差分别为43.5±21.0、33.3±31.7、42.6±23.3、40.2±24.4、33.5±23.5。治疗部位之间评分的差异主要归因于OAR分割以及OAR与计划靶体积(PTV)的接近程度。剂量师之间较小的评分差异归因于他们完成的计划数量。
这种方法允许对患者治疗进行比较,这将有助于改善患者护理和治疗结果。目前正在评估更大样本的治疗计划,以研究剂量师经验对计划质量的影响。